Pallavi's flip flops, DT Note Page 4, 6 - Page 4

Originally posted by: Deus_Vult

Just because something is legal doesn't mean that it is RIGHT. Slavery was legal many years ago... That doesn't make it right back then.

And if you're using your body autonomy as an argument then why can't someone choose to drink and drive? Its his body, its his choice to drink.. Its his car, its his choice to drive.

@bold - Are you serious right now? I don't know whether I should laugh or not.

I won't comment on abortion because we were requested to not discuss such a sensitive matter when it has no relation to your discussion topic. But you saying "it's his body, his choice to drink", "his choice to drive", etc. is unrelated to the topic. I totally agree with your statement as people should be allowed to drink if they want (and are of age) and should be allowed to drive if they want (and are of age and have a license). But, we are talking about DUIs, so driving while being under the influence of drugs. This is wrong and against the law.

But your original claim was not about what is lawful vs. unlawful, if I'm correct. Your point was to prove Pallavi as a hypocrite which is inaccurate as I have explained in my post before this one.

In my opinion Pallavi was a person who always thought about others than herself.

This is also because of the fact that she was an orphan and had a feeling of obligation towards them.

So when she got a family which she must have dreamt of in her childhood, she wanted to cling to it at any cost

That’s apparently why she took all the verbal and emotional abuse without any strong retaliation.

She somewhere wanted to cling to the love of a mother and father which she knew would lose if she retaliated.

She loved them so much that none could decipher that they are her in-laws and not own family.

But when she married Raghav, she found that same love and support in her mother-in law and thus she knew she had a place to go where she mattered and that family wasn’t because of obligation.

Also in Raghav’s house she felt like a free bird, who was given a choice and never questioned or abused.

Thus, she became that strong lady who was hell bent on punishing the culprit.

I guess I made some sense.

Originally posted by: Deus_Vult

Nobody will drink and drive under the SOLE INTENTION of killing some one. There is NO 100% PROBABILITY that someone will DIE from it.. But still its NOT his body his CHOICE eh?

Somebody who does abortions is doing it with the SOLE INTENTION of killing. There is 100% probabilty of death in this. But this is justified under the SAME tag of My body My choice...

Do you get it?

I'm using the SAME logic that you all use to show how flawed your reasoning is.🤦🏻‍♂️

Okay, my bad. I thought you were condoning drunk driving by ignorantly using the argument of "my drink, my choice" or whatever. Didn't realize this topic has come to abortion now too. Anyways, I don't agree with your view on abortion so I do not understand your analogy. However, I do respect your opinion. So, I will not discuss this point further since it has no relation to the actual topic.

Originally posted by: Deus_Vult

And which dialogue is that? Cause I don't remember her saying anything like that today..

I never said that Keerti is 100% right. I just used the same logic that you used in your previous post. You were justifying pallavi not taking any action against BWA by claiming that viewers don't know how much pallavi was told about the incident.. Similarly how can we judge Keerti when viewers didn't know whether keerti was aware if he was dead or not. Do you get it now?

Raghav is the store owner but it is not necessary to make business deals with Raghav. There are many other ways in which she can expand her business...It is NOT necessary to make business deals with your store owner like making special pouches for jewelleries and all that stuff.

@bold - Right after Pallavi does that drama to get Keerthi to confess she can't drive and Amma tells her to take Keerthi and Sunny to jail, Pallavi says no. She says she has received justice by just knowing who Mandaar's murderer was. And she says she doesn't want any of her family members to have a problem because of this (timestamp: 5:15). So, Pallavi isn't the hypocrite you claim her to be. She always stands by family.

@pink - You didn't use the same logic as me because not knowing whether someone is dead is different then not knowing the complete information of an incident. We are talking about a lack of responsibility versus a lack of information. Keerthi should've taken the initiative to get down from the car and admit Mandaar into the hospital since Sunny was not appropriately aware of his surroundings. She was responsible to at least tell the police. She was just scared of getting caught and now she wants to put the blame on Sunny because he was driving. She was a witness so she is equally at fault considering she also tried to save Sunny by allowing the blame to be put on someone else. Also, it's literally so logical. If you hit someone with your car, you need to get down and check on them. You don't throw that responsibility on someone else (like Raghav). If Raghav wasn't there, I'm sure the two would've left Mandaar to die. Now for Pallavi's scenario with the pictures thing, she wasn't even aware of the incident until after marriage. And even then she didn't find out that Sulochana committed the crime. I believe Raghav found out. Now, if Raghav didn't do anything for his sister's sake, then that's his problem.

@orange - She was on a time crunch, she was in debt, and Raghav was the connection she needed. She even tried to get a plot in the new mall being built I believe but even that was owned by Raghav. The orders for the sarees she did have were burnt by Raghav. The saree making competition was rigged because of Raghav and Sanki Baba tore up her hard-earned money. And mind you, the business deals happened after the pop-up shop thing of Jayati Jewelers. The customers at the event liked her sarees and she thought like a business women. She needed customers and Raghav needed some flair to his packaging. Hence, she made the offer. Pallavi knows how to keep enmity aside to benefit her business because at the end of the day, her family and their reputation mattered more to her than dealing with Raghav's presence.

DT Warning Note

Despite the previous DT note, you guys are bringing up abortion and now rape. Consider this as my last warning and henceforth no comment related to abortion or rape will be allowed here as these are very sensitive issues and unrelated to the point of discussion.

MHRW DT

Originally posted by: Deus_Vult

Nice dodge .. 😂.Someone already used the same excuse that it was Raghav's job to punish BWA. I agree that Raghav was wrong to let her go like that. But Raghav also forgave Keerti but that didn't stop Pallavi from plotting against Keerti to send her to jail nah?Now I know you will use excuses like Mandaar was her ex husband and hence she was more serious in this issue and all... But Keerti was her Sister in law when Pallavi came to know about the truth behind those photos. Pallavi did know that it was Sulo who did it. She talks about it in episode 79... the culprit was BWA (one of her ex husband's family member) Still she didn't do anything?

Another nice excuse. Imagine if you were in the place of Pallavi... Are you willing to make business deals with a guy who constantly threatens you, who kidnapped you two times and put you in the middle of a high way..

I know that this is just a TV show but still.

Ok I see your point but then if you're saying that Keerthi is Pallavi's sister-in-law, Sulochana Kaku is like Pallavi's aunt. And Pallavi probably knew (again, the show doesn't go into this) that this news would affect her Aai and Kaka the most. So in the end she protected her family from the shame of Kaku's crimes. Was this morally right? No. But can you call Pallavi a hypocrite because of it? Absolutely not because she still protected her family when the truth came out.

Since when did I say I agreed with Pallavi's values and lifestyle? I don't agree with them therefore my opinion on what I would do in her situation is completely different than the plot of this tv show and shouldn't matter. What I'm trying to get you to understand is Pallavi's perspective and empathizing with her. And my explanation is not an excuse lol. It's the turn of events that happened and in the business world, you have to put aside enmity to think about profit. Pallavi needed profit because of the shop's debt and the fastest way was through Raghav Rao. Even then, she tried other methods to receive extra income for the shop that had nothing to do with Raghav.

Originally posted by: Deus_Vult

Oh!! so she cared about Kaku's reputation even though they were NOT her real in laws by that time but not Raghav and Amma's reputation? 🤣🤣🤦🏻‍♂️

Ok then.

I just knew you were going to say this 😂😂 but why would Pallavi care about their reputation when they have "ruined" her life by taking her family away from her? The Deshmukh household (mainly Kaka and Aai and Nikhil) made her feel at home even after her marriage to Mandaar. What did Amma, Keerthi's mother, do as soon as she got to know Pallavi? She married Raghav off to Pallavi as an ultimatum for her staying with Raghav. Amma didn't care about Pallavi's feelings at the time whereas Aai and Kaka always have. So why should she care about their reputation over her previous family's reputation?

Originally posted by: nooriex

I just knew you were going to say this 😂😂 but why would Pallavi care about their reputation when they have "ruined" her life by taking her family away from her? The Deshmukh household (mainly Kaka and Aai and Nikhil) made her feel at home even after her marriage to Mandaar. What did Amma, Keerthi's mother, do as soon as she got to know Pallavi? She married Raghav off to Pallavi as an ultimatum for her staying with Raghav. Amma didn't care about Pallavi's feelings at the time whereas Aai and Kaka always have. So why should she care about their reputation over her previous family's reputation?

Another nice excuse.. Pallavi never showed any kind of hate to Amma in any episode. In fact, she even says to her Aai in one episode that Amma is exactly like her and she is lucky to have two mothers..

Come on... 🤦🏻‍♂️

Originally posted by: Deus_Vult

Another nice excuse.. Pallavi never showed any kind of hate to Amma in any episode. In fact, she even says to her Aai in one episode that Amma is exactly like her and she is lucky to have two mothers..

Come on... 🤦🏻‍♂️

Yes and I believe that's after the Vat Savitri puja or like right before it. Regardless, that happens after Pallavi gets to know about the Keerthi incident. You tell me, why would she take the responsibility of protecting someone's reputation that she's known for a few weeks versus someone's reputation that she's known for two years or even more?

Originally posted by: nooriex

Yes and I believe that's after the Vat Savitri puja or like right before it. Regardless, that happens after Pallavi gets to know about the Keerthi incident. You tell me, why would she take the responsibility of protecting someone's reputation that she's known for a few weeks versus someone's reputation that she's known for two years or even more?

NOPE..

Look at Epi 74 where she clearly says that she is very lucky to have a mother in law like Amma..

In the episode before that she also takes the side of Amma when Aai rebukes her..