Not a regular viewer but I see a lot of debate on priorities in life. Personally I feel like making a priority list of family members per se is very hard and it’s better to try and take decisions based on the situations. Just like some people had a problem with Aayi creating a ranking when she said a mother will always choose her kids over her spouse, I too believe ranking relationships are unnecessary. That being said, I don’t have experience in these things so you all probably know better.
Coming to this case, it isn’t as simple as priority priority. From Raghav’s point of view Keerthi going to jail will ruin her entire life while for Pallavi she’ll just be kept from closure. Then to guarantee her closure he was even willing to go to jail. The way he probably sees it is not getting closure is mentally draining. It’s also hard but Keerthi going to jail will be both mentally and physically draining with her future also ruined because her record will be tainted. As someone who has made mistakes himself, he probably feels like such harsh punishment is unnecessary if the person has changed. I’m not taking his side here, just saying that I don’t feel like priority case applies here because the impact on both of their lives will be difficult- if it were choosing between Pallavi and Keerthi going to jail then I would understand.
Otherwise I’m with Pallavi here and feel like the criminal must be punished. So many times te excuse of ruining their future is given to protect these people and I find it unfair.