What if the lawyer take shop papers and make it on Raghav Rao's name. Then BWA can claim pallavi gave shop to Raghav which leads to her getting thrown out.
Opinions?
What if the lawyer take shop papers and make it on Raghav Rao's name. Then BWA can claim pallavi gave shop to Raghav which leads to her getting thrown out.
Opinions?
Bigg Boss 19 - Daily Discusdion Topic - 2nd Nov 2025 - WKV
Bigg Boss 19: Daily Discussion Thread- 3rd Nov 2025.
🏏ICC Women's World Cup 2025: South Africa W vs India W, FINAL🏏
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai - 03 Nov 2025 EDT
GOLGUPPA PARTY 3.11
🏏India tour of Australia, 2025: AUS vs IND,3rd T20I, Oval🏏
Hahahahahahaha: New nicknames for Gen 4 lead couple.
Favourite couple : Nov.1, 2025.Best epi. HD Clip. 😆😆
Aishwarya Rai at fault for ruining Salman's life?
Did SRK copy Brad Pitt’s F1 look and style for King?
Mihir Is Such An
Kyunki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi 2 - Banner Contest
Why is Bigg Boss Hellbent on Saving Kunika?
📚Book Talk Forum, October 2025 Reading Challenge Results📚
Kartik Aryan's TMMTMTTR will clash with Agastya's Ikkis
well That DSE is already a rented one!!! Raghav rao is the owner of the shop!!!Originally posted by: lateuser1234
What if the lawyer take shop papers and make it on Raghav Rao's name. Then BWA can claim pallavi gave shop to Raghav which leads to her getting thrown out.
Opinions?
Originally posted by: lateuser1234
What if the lawyer take shop papers and make it on Raghav Rao's name. Then BWA can claim pallavi gave shop to Raghav which leads to her getting thrown out.
Opinions?
Most likely not, the cvs would like to create a little bit of drama and because Raghav Rao is already the new owner of the shop...it's not likely to be possible
Your theories seems good...only if it wasn't in his name already.🤣
well That DSE is already a rented one!!! Raghav rao is the owner of the shop!!!
True. But they have the rent agreement. It easy to blame that she gifted without anything 35 years old shop to him. Raghav making compromising pics of pallavi doesnt makes sense. So any reason to through her out should be more related to shop as Rambo is most concerned with it. I dont see any MMS stuff relating to pallu and RR.
shop pehlese se raghu k nam pe hai... bs rent agreement ke sath kuch lafda kregi BWA n vandilise hoga shop n as usual pallu ko lagega RR used his money n did it bcz lawyer use vhi khega BWA k kehne pe... so dono apni apni aag me jalenge... but still not getting the reason bound them in wedding knotOriginally posted by: lateuser1234
What if the lawyer take shop papers and make it on Raghav Rao's name. Then BWA can claim pallavi gave shop to Raghav which leads to her getting thrown out.
Opinions?
Originally posted by: lateuser1234
True. But they have the rent agreement. It easy to blame that she gifted without anything 35 years old shop to him. Raghav making compromising pics of pallavi doesnt makes sense. So any reason to through her out should be more related to shop as Rambo is most concerned with it. I dont see any MMS stuff relating to pallu and RR.
I think he would avoid doing MMS-related stuff because he doesn't want to hurt his mother further.
well That DSE is already a rented one!!! Raghav rao is the owner of the shop!!!
35 Years rented and given away can be concern for Rambo. Few clause can be added to make it seem more OTT like giving rights of DSE brand.
Originally posted by: ImHemangi
reason bound them in wedding knot
Him amma kyunki pallu out. Her to get DSE and sabak. contract kind off. u marry me i will give back DSE.
Originally posted by: SnehaSneha
Your theories seems good...only if it wasn't in his name already.🤣
What about giving up DSE brand. 35 years and all drama.