Did not post it in the regional discussion thread as thought this should be discussed as a separate topic.
Let me first say that I like Shaurya better than Shankho, which may be attributed entirely to the performances. KV displays Shaurya's emotions with so much subtlety that it is difficult not to like him. That said, even in Bengal, Shankho has more fans than Mohor. At least that is the impression I got from social media.
Some basic similarities are bound to be there as both Shaurya and Shankho come from similar backgrounds and have similar characteristics. Both their mothers left them at a young age. But Shankho's father was physically and emotionally always present for him whereas Shaan was physically present but emotionally absent. Both of them are angry at their mothers but we find more justifications for Shaurya's anger because his father failed him too.
Shaurya's anger and behaviour primarily stems from being unloved by both his parents. He is indebted to his adoptive mother but suffocated by her micromanaging his life.
Shankho's elder uncle and aunt were also manipulative but they were not helicopter parents like Devi. Shankho too feels indebted to them but not to the extent Shaurya feels to Devi.
Now coming to their misogynistic nature. As I see it, that is the basic theme or message of the show. I think the idea was to depict how the patriarchial notions and traditions can break families, destroy a bright career, instills gender stereotypes in the minds of people right from the childhood. Though Shaurya and Shankho are extreme cases (may be for the purpose of dramatic effect), it happens in normal families too. Men believe women are to behave a certain way. If a woman does not fall within their mould of an ideal woman, they question such women's character.
Shaurya and Shankho both have adopted the image of an ideal woman based on their families' perceptions. Shaurya may be on the surface a milder version of Shankho but underneath they are almost the same.
If Shaurya speaks for the women of the family so does Shankho.
It is true Shankho pushed Mohor but later he was repentant too.
I wrote this whole essay just to put across the point that if Shaurya, as per the spoilers and sbs, questions Anokhi's character for meeting Ahir, it won't be totally against his character. I may be wrong but Shaurya might be a believer of the theory that too much independent thinking women are also easy. Perhaps he thinks a man and woman cannot be just good friends. Also we know Shaurya's emotions always get the better of him, especially w.r.t people he is deeply attached. If he could say things like "I don't care if you live or die" to his own mother who he loves, we should not be surprised if he calls Anokhi gold digger and characterless. It not only stems from jealousy, but also a sense of possessiveness he feels for Anokhi. Like she belongs to him, and cannot do things which go against his ideals.
Anokhi's fiercely independent nature is going to be a bone of contention between her and Shaurya. Mohor's entire premise is based on that. So it is bound to happen here too. Shaurya is not perfect and till now we could justify all of his flaws by blaming it on his parents. This one will be difficult to justify as upbringing alone should not shape someone's mindset, people change their perceptions as they meet with different people and learn more about the world, but it takes time. Shaurya will love Anokhi deeply, that process has already started but their relationship will last only when he learns to respect Anokhi not for her caring nature but also for her independent thinking.