Ghum Hain kisikey Pyaar Mein WU and Daily discussion thread no 8. - Page 112

I know everybody gets pissed by Virakhi scenes. I guess she is the 3rd lead so it will be there. I may be in minority who is okay with Virakhi scenes (chappals accepted ;-) ).

The problem I have is with bad execution of the storyline. 75% zillat arena; 25% main couple. Even this was fine if the family drama was good - but it is repetitive, cringy, crass....and most of the times, extremely boring. Pakhi's characterisation is flat.

Originally posted by: jane_austen

I know everybody gets pissed by Virakhi scenes. I guess she is the 3rd lead so it will be there. I may be in minority who is okay with Virakhi scenes (chappals accepted ;-) ).

The problem I have is with bad execution of the storyline. 75% zillat arena; 25% main couple. Even this was fine if the family drama was good - but it is repetitive, cringy, crass....and most of the times, extremely boring. Pakhi's characterisation is flat.

I am okay with it too but she does the same shit over and over again. Sometimes the scenes are so out of place and obvious that they just added it for the sake of adding it and not furthering the plot

Originally posted by: jane_austen

True. They have not developed Pakhi's character well or made it gel with the story as the 3rd lead. The actor too looks unconvinced by her character.

Yep yep!!!

Also the fact that the actor hasn’t been informed the character arc so nothing adds up for the character

The character had a lot of potential to be a good negative lead.. but alas what can we do

Originally posted by: jane_austen

True. They have not developed Pakhi's character well or made it gel with the story as the 3rd lead. The actor too looks unconvinced by her character.

Yeah they definitely dropped the ball there. I thought I was biased for disliking her character or being indifferent to her as a third lead. But it’s looks like the popular opinion.

They can show her doing her own things . Instead she is always almost always making chai, it’s like trolling their own character. She can be seen talking and sharing her problems with her tfriend and parents. If not this, turn her into an intelligent vamp. Instead she is neither here nor there.

Hope next time virat will not reject with his so call important pakhi food after separation

Originally posted by: jane_austen

Exactly. As the third lead, they can show more Pakhi scenes - her feelings, her motivations, her manipulations. I personally don't think it is due to off-screen dynamics but rather blame it on unimaginative writing.

They should have shown all that. But they won’t because till the end we won’t know who did it so the villains are just let go without any blame. That’s the only reason they don’t show all this.

The writers are wasting a character. It’s secondary now how she acts if she gets well written sceneS. Personally not a fan of her OTT reactions when she gets angry. The focus of the Ladakh trip fight was on her, but i didn’t quite enjoy it.

I agree too. On paper, her character has so many interesting layers. But the actor is not convinced.. honestly nor are the writers. Her dialogues about beizzati are getting repetitive. Yesterday too they had a long sequence focussing on chai ..her giving each one chai. So boring! Each character saying thank you to her..I mean ...what a waste of time.

They are adding too many Virat-Pakhi scenes which add no value whatsoever to her character and in fact degrade Virat's character. More than the FL...it is her SS that is affecting the ML..

She is necessary to the plot but they are making her comical and her acting ....no comments. Half the time, we are trying to decipher her expressions.