why is anushka considered pretty but not alia - Page 2

Originally posted by: TMKOC_MY

Can we know these conventions point by point and then we can see where does Alia lies?

To be conventionally pretty in Bollywood, you gotta have most of these features ~ tall, feminine, nice teeth & nice smile, delicate, sharp and asymmetrical features, nice legs,ass, full lips etc.

Originally posted by: TMKOC_MY

I know these are yours for sure

Okay tell me whose waistline you find the hottest in bollywood?

Ileana and Tamanna ☺️ Like wow!!!

Originally posted by: TMKOC_MY

I know these are yours for sure

Okay tell me whose waistline you find the hottest in bollywood?

Define Waistline 😆

Originally posted by: Sharpener

Ileana and Tamanna ☺️ Like wow!!!

High five.

I don't like tamanna idk why?

Ileana and Nina Dobrev, these both have that extra curvy waist which looks so hot.

There's something about Anushka's features that have calmed down in the past few years. She looked very different during the PK days. Regardless, she's really tall and has a model-like frame that has gotten her through. Alia doesn't, and her baby face doesn't help

Originally posted by: Maroonporsche

Define Waistline 😆

24 in 36-24-26

Originally posted by: Sharpener

To be conventionally pretty in Bollywood, you gotta have most of these features ~ tall, feminine, nice teeth & nice smile, delicate, sharp and asymmetrical features, nice legs,ass, full lips etc.

NOT boyish, baby-faced and oddly mouse shaped eyes and terrible teeth, thin lips etc.

How can u forgot the nostrils ? 🤣

Originally posted by: TMKOC_MY

24 in 36-24-26

Jackie

She puts the Sri in Sri Lanka

Originally posted by: Maroonporsche

Jackie

She puts the Sri in Sri Lanka

For me Jackie's best feature is her thighs and eyes 👀

All posters who act like feminists on this forum always show their true colors once they start discussing the looks of actresses.