Originally posted by: BornWithASmirk
RKs character might be different from each other but the way he executes them all the same - they come out as a man child. May be he highlights that quality more then it is his shortcomings as an actor.
Compare that to Ranveer, he blends with character perfectly. You can't tell Khilji is the same person who played Bitto or a Murad.
Ranveer is versatile but sometimes I feel lacks depth. RK has depth but is one dimensional.
DP too same (has depth but monotonous).
the only difference between khilji and bitto are the clothes anf the era apart from that both performances can easily be termed as overacting of century
if changing clothes is versatile then yes ranveer is a versatile actor
there is absolutely no similarity between samar ved barfi and bunny neither in way character was written or in the way it was excuted
but please do define man child as much as i know it means an immature man
i dont see how a man as cunning as samar comes into that category
or bunny who was shown as ambitious hard working man
or even barfi who was very clever the way he survived in this world
comment:
p_commentcount