Sleet of Emotional Quivers on RadhaKrishn Eternal Love CC # 9 - Page 82

Created

Last reply

Replies

1.1k

Views

62.9k

Users

18

Likes

1.7k

Frequent Posters

624284 thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar

There was no Radha in MBh or Harivamsa or Bhagavatham.


Radha is seen first in Jayadeva's Gita Govindam. Her origin comes from folklore and is likely related to Nalpinnai, a child bride of Krishna's when he was in Gokul as per Southern stories.


The only religious texts Radha is seen in are the puranas which were written later. For ex, Brahma Vaivarta Purana is plain fan fiction where all tridevi are in love with Krishna. More or less like Indonesian Mahabharata where all women are in love with Arjuna.


Krishna married for political reasons, not love. In fact, there is good reason to doubt the existence if Rukmini as per Canon texts on Krishna since Pradyumna is stated bluntly to be older than her. Jambavati was a rescue marriage. Satyabhama was the one Krishna married as an arranged deal, and hence the suggestion she was his favorite wife.


Reason foe Radha not there is Radha and Rukmini are same ..But accept your views too..this much Radha i mean SriRadha involvement could have been avoided.


Radha was not specified for a reason and in bhagvatam it specified krishna was close to a Gopika which is about Radha.


Radha krishna relationship is so secret so its not specified

vyapti thumbnail
Gift Of Giving Contest- Participant  Thumbnail 7th Anniversary Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar

There was no Radha in MBh or Harivamsa or Bhagavatham.


Radha is seen first in Jayadeva's Gita Govindam. Her origin comes from folklore and is likely related to Nalpinnai, a child bride of Krishna's when he was in Gokul as per Southern stories.


The only religious texts Radha is seen in are the puranas which were written later. For ex, Brahma Vaivarta Purana is plain fan fiction where all tridevi are in love with Krishna. More or less like Indonesian Mahabharata where all women are in love with Arjuna.


Krishna married for political reasons, not love. In fact, there is good reason to doubt the existence if Rukmini as per Canon texts on Krishna since Pradyumna is stated bluntly to be older than her. Jambavati was a rescue marriage. Satyabhama was the one Krishna married as an arranged deal, and hence the suggestion she was his favorite wife.

Who then was the mother of Pradyumna?

Chiillii thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 90 Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 5 years ago

As per Harivansh Pradyumna who is to be born to Rukmini was given in adoption to Gandusha the brother of Vasudev,which seems to make no sense.

He was therefore Krishna's cousin adopted by him as son from his uncle Gandusha.

1123225 thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: vyapti

Who then was the mother of Pradyumna?


Harivamsa is also the text which adds Pradyumna was older than Rukmini. I believe Bhagavatham states Pradyumna was almost same age as Krishna.


As Chillii says, Krishna gave Pradyumna to Gandusha for adoption.


Putting all this together, Pradyumna was likely Krishna's cousin who was almost same age as Krishna. Pradyumna was adopted as Krishna by heir.


Bottomline: we don't know who his mother was. We do know he was not Krishna's bio son and was likely Gandusha's son.

624284 thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar


Harivamsa is also the text which adds Pradyumna was older than Rukmini. I believe Bhagavatham states Pradyumna was almost same age as Krishna.


As Chillii says, Krishna gave Pradyumna to Gandusha for adoption.


Putting all this together, Pradyumna was likely Krishna's cousin who was almost same age as Krishna. Pradyumna was adopted as Krishna by heir.


Bottomline: we don't know who his mother was. We do know he was not Krishna's bio son and was likely Gandusha's son.


Oh is it..Hearing this first time

1123225 thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: Sweetypie34


Oh is it..Hearing this first time


Mbh, HV, and SB are the main texts on Krishna. Rukmini doesn't even appear in real-time in MBh. HV plainly refutes the claim Pradyumna was her son or even Krishna's son.


Radha doesn't appear in any.


I think Satyabhama was Krishna's main wife.

624284 thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar


Mbh, HV, and SB are the main texts on Krishna. Rukmini doesn't even appear in real-time in MBh. HV plainly refutes the claim Pradyumna was her son or even Krishna's son.


Radha doesn't appear in any.


I think Satyabhama was Krishna's main wife.


Ya different books written differently on terms of Krishna life

Agni_Jytsona thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago

Ye kya edit hua πŸ˜†

1123225 thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago
πŸ˜† Forgot to quote. Then accidentally made duplicate post while quoting.


It's been so boring, man. Even picking unnecessary fights on BW forum is now totally boring.

Sutapasima thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar

πŸ˜† Forgot to quote. Then accidentally made duplicate post while quoting.


It's been so boring, man. Even picking unnecessary fights on BW forum is now totally boring.

🀣🀣🀣


Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".