Abhinav and intelligent- what a joke! - Page 3

Originally posted by: Picasso9

pity you didn’t remember Abhinav stating they are animals and criminals just yesterday. So he and his wife vilifying Rahul’s reputation is not a form of bullying in your book.
when he and his wife make unnecessary comments on Ejaz and his mental state or use Jasmin’s childhood trauma as a shoulder to shoot from and attack Rahul, then it’s ok.

Selective much.

So yes, they are dumb. If they can’t be better, they Are completely dumb.

Actually I dont remember Abhinav saying criminals. If he did then shame on him. But thats gossiping, not bullying. Nikki herself called rahul a sewer and Jaan agreed but thats also nasty bitching, not bullying. Bullying is mocking someone to their face which is what happens to Abhinav. We just see it on the weekend but Abhinav gets called a lot of things to the face if you watxh extra dose footage.

Eijaz himself says he has mental issues so for me thats not a bad thing. Saying a black person is black, does not equate to racism. Also jasmine does have traumatic experience which explains so much as to why she was disturbed, that is not using it, that is simply explaining why she reacted the way she did.

Your pov fair enough but I disagree.

Originally posted by: SP2684

Apologies if this is repetitive because I think I wrote another reply to you along these lines:

I don’t think it’s the same issue though - because Punnu’s reaction didn’t paint Rahul a criminal, accused of threatening her and wanting to harm her. There’s a world of difference IMO - particularly in terms of the gravity of those allegations.

Both used women card and I'm sorry but accusing someone of character assassination is damn serious. In fact, pavitra even added that crimes happen to girls because of people like rahul. I mean that's pretty damn serious imo.

Besides - that was hardly what was being asked of Abhinav. He was trying to justify him egging on Jasmine and pushing the matter because people sympathized with Punnu on the other matter. That makes zero sense.

Tbh I asked the same question as Abhinav did when watching the Jasmine vs rahul incident so i dont think he was wrong because I raised the same question way before this epsiode. Even I want to know why pavitra was let go because that breakdown was so dumb to me considering pavitra was reacting on something she herself said. Even if Abhinav and ruby are wrong in their stance, at least their view has been consistent whereas pavitra and others change their stance when it suits them.

As Sallu pointed out today, Abhinav wasn’t even there, but he went with it even though there were other voices of reason in the house - people that are not team Rahul - people like Naina.

Maybe but I think Abhinav is thinking more about jasmines pov. Tbh he had points, jasmine wouldnt have changed her behaviour and been disturbed got 3 days had she been faking it. Not rahul fault but BB definitely need to call help for jasmine because if this is happening due to her experience then all this will only make it worse.

And given he claims to be so mature and sorted and logical - him encouraging Jasmine was really stupid of him. That crying kid analogy was equally stupid - you don’t take your kid to the boy that supposedly threatened her and say well done beta, you threw water on him . And what made it worse was that he was still at it today even after Sallu played the clip.

Of course you take ur kid to the bully and tell them to teach him a lesson. Agreed water throwing was wrong but Salman was egging him on to not support Jasmine. They said it themselves that intention was the issue and maybe rahul did have intentions. See I side with rahul here but I wouldnt give him a clean chit because there are things which hint rahul is something they dont show. Knife incident wasnt shown, nikki keeps saying he is vile and that dog calling was not cool, jaan says hes a psychopath, jasmine and ruby dont get a good vibe from him etc. All those things are not just a coincidence. Abhinav is right, maybe it is different for them because they actually live with him.

On the one hand he says he supported Jasmine without considering both sides because friendship is most important to him. And on the other - he says he always sides with what and who’s right in the house. Can’t have both - he made no sense there either.

Agree. Hes supporting jasmine mostly because hes her friend.

Honestly - I’m disappointed - I expected better from Abhinav than going with Jasmine and Rubina’s stupidity last week. And he went 10 steps ahead and is still calling Rahul a criminal.

If he truly thinks so - is truly scared of Rahul - then either get Rahul ousted, or leave yourself. If not - he needs to shut up with such labels.

I agree. He shouldnt judge rahul like that. Its extreme.