Sushant Singh Rajput Case Thread #11 - DT Warning p.88 - Page 74

Originally posted by: fosla

Yes but warriors and IT cell on one side tilts the scale very oddly on one end making it no match!

Put the same test to the sisters as Rhea and then we can defend the same way

Depends on what you are fighting against.. are you fighting against the media trial? Fair enough.. but then you are indulging in the same media trial when you call his sister a molester without any proof?

Are you fighting against the family naming Rhea as the accused? Aren't you accusing the family too?

Works both ways

Originally posted by: Anika80

wait and you soon will have proves.

Oohhh. I am definitely waiting and so are the others..

Why should I believe Rhea's statements without any proofs, when it has been proved several times that she keeps lying through her teeth?

If I won't believe SSR family without proof, then I won't believe Rhea as well without proof.

It seems pretty coincidental to me, that the sister who was handling finances was conveniently accused first and rift was created in between them..

All this news is coming from media only, then why should I believe India Today/Aaj Tak?

After all the media houses are vile and are doing it for TRP, be it Republic, Times Now or India Today.

How did people know Rhea know ED has given her clean chit?? Did I miss ED official press conference??

Originally posted by: fosla

Yes but warriors and IT cell on one side tilts the scale very oddly on one end making it no match!

Put the same test to the sisters as Rhea and then we can defend the same way

Naomi Datta

@nowme_datta

I look back at copybook media trials like Amanda Knox in Italy & the Talwars to see that the media trials have irreversible consequences for the accused. The verdict stays guilty as charged, no matter what the law finally decides. Inevitable trajectory.

Rhea Chakraborty’s Court Trial Doesn’t Matter. Family WhatsApp Groups Have Already Declared Her...

arre.co.in

Originally posted by: zehreeli.kheer

Bringing in the woman angle in this case is ridiculous to be honest 😆

Supporting Rhea is fine but then you can't ask for a fair trial for Rhea and consider the molestation allegation that hasn't been proven as the gospel truth simply because Rhea said so.. Proof is needed to call Rhea a murderer and proof is needed to call the sister a molester too.

Family needs to provide proofs for their claims but Rhea mata does not need to provide any proof to prove their claims.

Here - Looks like Drug Cartel with Code language

https://twitter.com/TimesNow/status/1299342000580222976

Originally posted by: fosla

Harneet Singh


@Harneetsin

F*g hell Times Now !! You are showing pictures of his dead body and then you say you are not being voyeuristic !! How low will you stoop you vultures ?? Is this even legally allowed? How is his family allowing these pics to be shared? Give the boy some dignity for Gods sake.

sharing or looking at dead body is having no dignity while watching p**n and half naked girls is giving respect of highest order, even God will shake his head on the hypocrisy.

https://twitter.com/TimesNow/status/1299325743663468547?s=20

Originally posted by: NorthNode

Kersi Chavda and Mahesh Bhatt both went to Don Bosco school and have been friends ever since. Mahesh Bhatt refers a lot of rich clients to Chavda.

Did he sent his daughter to chavda, who said she was ignored and depressed since age 13 but then buddha couldn't recognise her mental illness

His son said he didn't treated him like son,was like b *strd child caused mental illness , alia adopted papa jo

And he roams around giving gyan and acting like pervy buddha

Originally posted by: xROBINx

no there is one rule.

Family needs to provide proofs for their claims but Rhea mata does not need to provide any proof to prove their claims.

I have been saying it from the start.. Rhea being a murderer has to be proved.. till then calling her names is not fair.

But the sisters being called greedy, attention-seeking and molester is equally wrong