OH NOOOOOO !!!! - Page 4

Originally posted by: Manisha_Vankar

🤣

Haa...ye best rahega..fir wo akele apni life enjoy karegi

🤣😆😉

Originally posted by: Autumn09

I think it would be like Sudha Chandran's character in Naagin 1. She was introduced as a loving, caring mother in the beginning fearing for her son's safety and her evil designs were revealed later.

They can't make Sharad-Surabhi pairing work here without showing Hriday as a negative character (Indian dramas have no place for good second leads like Kdramas) and if Hriday is shown as dubious, it'll repeat Naagin 3 storyline of Bela and Vikrant. So I feel if Sharad is Hriday and he's recognised both Naageshwari and Aakesh.

But you're right they've given Hriday too less screen space preincarnation. So not sure how it'll work.

Even for badass jay they need a good actor who can pull it off. Mohit is not at all apt for that.

First of all wiki galat hota hai. Kuch din pehle likha tha Mrunal Jain will be in cheel's Character. Iss liye dar hi gayi thi. And agar yeh twist hota toh Ekta itni fool nhi hai k wiki pe woh bata k Saara secret khol de. Or maybe they r trying to confuse people or to make them curious..

Mujhe SM hi cheel chahiye...

Par agar SM naag ho to ek kam karo cv naag & cheel ki aatma ko change karwado...to SM naag par usme aatma cheel...

Pagal mat samjna mujhe...par kon cheel hai kon naag soch soch ke confuse ho chuki hu to kuch bhi likh rahi hu kyuki SM hi chahiye cheel

Originally posted by: Autumn09

I think it would be like Sudha Chandran's character in Naagin 1. She was introduced as a loving, caring mother in the beginning fearing for her son's safety and her evil designs were revealed later.

They can't make Sharad-Surabhi pairing work here without showing Hriday as a negative character (Indian dramas have no place for good second leads like Kdramas) and if Hriday is shown as dubious, it'll repeat Naagin 3 storyline of Bela and Vikrant. So I feel if Sharad is Hriday and he's recognised both Naageshwari and Aakesh.

But you're right they've given Hriday too less screen space preincarnation. So not sure how it'll work.

The thing about Sudha Chandran, is that she can nail any character be it positive or negative. Same goes for Dheeraj, Hina and Sharad. However, Mohit is limited range actor. I can’t imagine him as a cheel no matter how hard I try. He can try replicating the samraat character but it’s going to require a lot more than just samraat to pull off a cheel and when you compare the same with Dheeraj or Sharad it’ll look pathetic.

Coming back to the story, It seems that they might show that Aakesh reincarnated as a naag and Hriday reincarnated as a cheel. But if that’s the case then it would be really unfair to Aakeshwari fans, like seriously the powerful and charismatic Cheel reincarnated as some idiot Naag with average screen presence and the Invisible Naag becomes a powerful Cheel in his next life? So Nageshwari is getting trolled apparently.

Till yesterday,it was mentioned in wiki that Sharad is Aakesh reincarnated.Immediately after the third episode,wiki bhi edit hogaya😆 Bhai log,wikipedia is a mandir ka ghanta jahaan pe koi bhi haath saaf karke nikal sakta hai.

Ekta tries hard to create suspense but eventually turns out to be predictable at the end of the day.In Naagin 1,she tried to play around with Shivanya and Sesha but it was evident that Shivanya was primary naagin and the story revolved around her because Mouni was highlighted in all articles as the female lead.In Naagin 3,I wasn't confused for a moment between Bela and Vishaka because the story is always about the main lead in EK shows.So if we trust the articles and EK's predictability then Sharad will turn out to be Aakesh only.She will play around with us for a while and have us believe that Jay is Aakesh.

So we just have to figure out who is the male lead and usse cheel ka cheel aur naag ka naag hojayega. Let's see. Between the characters,who had more screenspace and prominence in the first episode? Aakesh did.Hriday was even more insignificant than Vikrant.Who was played by a more popular actor? Aakesh. So,irrespective of whether he was the antihero or villain,lead toh apne Aakesh babua hi thay.

Now we all can do the math regarding the more bankable face between Sharad and Mohit. Who has delivered back to back hit shows as a lead recently and who is the better actor with a solid fanbase? 😉Aakesh bhi wohi hoga and main lead bhi wohi.

Iss cheel aur naag ke chakkar main hum apna popat bana rahe hain😆

mohit can never hold the madness intensity and obsession of cheel no ways the fire that dheeraj has ignite as cheel rajkumar aakesh only sharad can erupt it as volcano

Eww this will be a bigger disaster than N4 then, if Ekta does not learn now, then she will never. Sharad is just infinite times better in both acting and in his screen presence to carry off the grey character of Akesh, it will be huge disappointment if Ekta even tries to make Mohit play Akesh, heck he cannot even carry a proper naag with intensity, obsessive cheel ka toh no question at all.

Sharad is the more prominet lead, his entry and the impact in the episode made it obvious, be it naag or cheel, I am quite sure that he is the actual lead but all i want to be sure is he is the cheel too, that will make the show interesting and bearable, otherwise the show will be in scanner just like season 4.

Ekta and Sharad had good collaborations and he has always been the lead in her shows and in all his shows, so there is no doubt that he will be the prominent and actual lead opposite surbhi, but if he plays the naag then that means the naag was always the original lead and if he plays Akesh (which i want him to) then it is a masterstroke by the makers, they will finally make an interesting piece of story which includes the male lead as the main culprit in his pichla janam.

Guys about the lock on the wiki page. Locks like that, that indicate editing protection, can easily be set up by any random person by requesting a wikipedia admin, especially if there have been too many edits done in a short period of time or any other signs of too much vadalism in short periods of time. So the lock on it is nothing official by the production house or anyone from the team. It also means that then any editing on the page can only be done by a wiki admin through whom apparently you have to send a request to have information edited. I read this in the past about wikipedia.

Although guys when I read on that wiki page that aakesh reincarnation is jai and veer is hriday (despite jai being shown all goody goody like hriday was, and veer being shown bad like aakesh) I was shocked because I thought, what if they really are misleading us by making us think the goody-goody jai is the goody-goody hriday of past life, and that the bad-boy veer is the bad aakesh of past life, but instead they will shock us by showing that we were mistaken about their identities and just assumed things on the basis of their current life personalities matching to their previous life. I mean in every season ekta has used this misleading trick on audience, so why would she not do it this season?

Remember those snake charmers/ pandits words about how the story will be completely different this time and indicated the same story will play out in a new way etc. Somewhere why do I fear ekta again is misleading us? Even the articles said that sharad character will be negative then turn positive. So if we look at it from the theory of veer being hriday, that would mean the article meant that veer is first shown evil then he remembers he was the good hriday in past life and turns good. Oh god I so so soooooo hope I'm wrong about this.

Because in the past life they didn't shown any real connection between hriday and nageshwari that made us feel he is her true love, and instead the connection was shown between nageshwari and aakesh. So why would they then choose to show that in this life she hates hriday initially if he is shown as evil veer, as then that would mean that she will later fall in love with hriday as the story goes on. Ok my head is spinning.

Much better story would be if she hates aakesh as veer even in this life time but eventually falls in love with him and aakesh redeems himself in the second life and proves himself as nageshwari aka bani's true soulmate over hriday aka jai. Because like someone said, in the past life the ritual that would bind hriday and nageshwari forever as a naag-naagin jodi was not carried out to completion due to aakesh. That, alongside the lack of a connection shown between them hints that hriday is not nageshwari's true soulmate at all.