SSR's CA rubbishes any allegations of financial bungling - Page 5

Originally posted by: BeingBlunt

Basic common sense says that if Rhea took control of everything, How can it be financial bungling?

It would be normal transactions isn't it? Just that Rhea would be doing it in place of sushant isnt it?

Also the news of Rhea changing his staff, could easily be that this CA was planted by her.

The problem is that everyone will get away because they can easily say all the transactions were done with the approval of SSR.

Originally posted by: Sashay01

Yeah but arent they making a case that the money is "unaccounted" for? Or are they saying it went straight into Rhea and family's account? Because if it's the latter, then there will be no need for a prolonged investigation- the money trail will be clear.

If they are saying it was laundered and unaccounted for, then CA's version negates that.

Anyway, cant be sure. No facts either way yet.

Accounting issue would have completely different consequences.

Originally posted by: OspraYZod

suyaash we should also leave this toxic place. can u see how ppl here frequently changing color,supporting rhea? are they for real? they are laughing on sushant's death calling him uncle,uska daat thik nehi tha,rhea is,CA watever said is right.so who is wrong acco to them?sush's family!!

wah if walo wah 👏

And i never understood this term devils advocate. Isnt devil the bad guy ? Why would you want to defend a bad guy?

I mean your agenda is so strong that the family of the victim is wrong and random CA ( which could have been appointed by the alleged culprit ) is right ?

Originally posted by: trouble_006

Bihar police and SSR's family will decide whether the case needs to pursued or not. Who the f*** are these journalists to pass such snooty remarks. Unko circus banana hai ya zoo shouldn't be of any concern to these journos. It's a fundamental right of the family.

Aise bhi what can be the worst outcome, that Rhea and her family gets a clean chit? Doesn't sound like the end of the world to me. Toh fir inn gatekeepers of morality ko kya problem hai.

Also, aren't journalists all over the world always in search of a scoop/story, always trying for an investigation? Ye pehla journo hoga who wants a case to be shut just relying on the statements of the CA and wants no investigation.

IF wont allow me to post off topic things. 😉

Originally posted by: BeingBlunt

@ big: This is not totally unseen for me. I have seen worse. If should could hire one of the most expensive lawyers, whats stopping her to hire few people for doing her defending.

And i never understood this term devils advocate. Isnt devil the bad guy ? Why would you want to defend a bad guy?

I mean your agenda is so strong that the family of the victim is wrong and random CA ( which could have been appointed by the alleged culprit ) is right ?

Huh?? Who said the family is wrong??? They have also asked questions in their FIR. If the money is unaccounted for or if it is in order, based on the person who handled the money, wouldn't a money trail be easily established?

Dont understand your response. Yeh discussion ke liye lagaya, kisiko clean chit dene ke liye nahi ya accuse karne ke liye nahi. What else will we do in a forum?