Kangana isn’t wrong!!! - Page 7

Created

Last reply

Replies

99

Views

6k

Users

34

Likes

251

Frequent Posters

Grumpydwarf24 thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 5 years ago
#61

Originally posted by: Maroonporsche


He was removed from S30 and Anurag Kashyap had to finish it. They never brought in in the promotions even


Its the reason their studio collapsed


Well are you arguing he didn't deserve it? Hrithik STILL worked with him. Now don't tell me he must have been convinced that Kangana was also hallucinating abuse because other victims also came out.

Maroonporsche thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago
#62

Originally posted by: grumpydwarf


Well are you arguing he didn't deserve it? Hrithik STILL worked with him. Now don't tell me he must have been convinced that Kangana was also hallucinating abuse because other victims also came out.


No im saying your comment of Vikas never working with Kangana again shows her bravery hold little weight as his own career is null and void.

Grumpydwarf24 thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 5 years ago
#63

Originally posted by: Maroonporsche


No im saying your comment of Vikas never working with Kangana again shows her bravery hold little weight as his own career is null and void.


I believe he just delivered a hit with Hrithik. And no before the #metoo movement he was a sought after director with the exception of Shandaar. Aloo is no Kangana that was just proof.

1188351 thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago
#64

Originally posted by: Chameli_billi


Exactly! So what if she’s problematic herself a lot of times?! She’s not afraid to speak up. Why does a woman have to be a stain free Sita Maiyya to speak up against injustice? People love shooting the messenger instead of paying attention to the message. She has been making a lot of good points. No wonder people like Simi Garewal, Shekhar Kapoor have praised her. And even more people are now speaking up

So on point about shooting the messenger—obviously they can’t deny what she says, so let’s just keep attacking her personal life instead!

If the criteria to speak for a cause is that you have to bee a doodh ka dhula angel, world might as well collapse cuz no one is that—no one—not a single person in or outside the realm of Bollywood!

Grumpydwarf24 thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 5 years ago
#65

Btw topic maker I commend your bravery for being able to make this post. I feel the same exact way but this forum has become so toxic that no one anymore feels free to express how they feel. You deserve to be applauded.

Sashay01 thumbnail
Visit Streak 90 Thumbnail 5th Anniversary Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 5 years ago
#66

Originally posted by: coldbrew

So on point about shooting the messenger—obviously they can’t deny what she says, so let’s just keep attacking her personal life instead!

If the criteria to speak for a cause is that you have to bee a doodh ka dhula angel, world might as well collapse cuz no one is that—no one—not a single person in or outside the realm of Bollywood!


No, no one has to be dhudh ku dhuli but intentions do matter. If under the garb of feminism and equal opportunities you're only bullying other female actresses and outsiders for being "chaatu" or choosing a different path than you or most importantly if you cut parts of outsiders when YOU have power on a film set and dismiss their grievances as "chhote mote actors" then it makes you a RAGING hypocrite who is equally an oppressor!


Want to make a difference? Why didn't you create opportunities for others who didnt do your "chaatukarita" (Sonu Sood)? And now using SSR whom you never even bothered to speak to while that man was alive to settle scores is plain disgusting. And EVERYONE beyond the most devoted fans can see it.

1188351 thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago
#67

Originally posted by: Sashay01


No, no one has to be dhudh ku dhuli but intentions do matter. If under the garb of feminism and equal opportunities you're only bullying other female actresses and outsiders for being "chaatu" or choosing a different path than you or most importantly if you cut parts of outsiders when YOU have power on a film set and dismiss their grievances as "chhote mote actors" then it makes you a RAGING hypocrite who is equally an oppressor!


Want to make a difference? Why didn't you create opportunities for others who didnt do your "chaatukarita" (Sonu Sood)? And now using SSR whom you never even bothered to speak to while that man was alive to settle scores is plain disgusting. And EVERYONE beyond the most devoted fans can see it.


Kangana had issues with a few, everyone has their fair share of differences with people and coactors—that, again, only makes her human, not a “raging hypocrite.” I see more hypocrisy in putting up goody two shoes facade and sabotaging people behind the scenes.


She doesn’t owe it to the rest of the people to exemplify perfection just because she speaks her mind about the elephant in the room no one dares to address. Which world do the haters live in? Barring Mother Teresa maybe, everyone has done something “bad” or has had disagreements.

Everyone is allowed the wiggle room to be human and have disagreements with others. Since when do Taapsee n Swara symbolize the entire outsider clan anyway that she’s being accused of “putting down outsiders.” If those two start shit with her, she has every right to react. You can’t hold that against the points she makes about Bollywood’s hypocrisy—it’s simply not an acceptable argument.

Maroonporsche thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago
#68

Originally posted by: coldbrew


If those two start shit with her, she has every right to react. You can’t hold that against the points she makes about Bollywood’s hypocrisy—it’s simply not an acceptable argument.


Well Kangana called Tapsee Saasti for no reason.

1188351 thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago
#69

Originally posted by: grumpydwarf

Btw topic maker I commend your bravery for being able to make this post. I feel the same exact way but this forum has become so toxic that no one anymore feels free to express how they feel. You deserve to be applauded.


By any chance, does the topic starter have some solid backing? Cuz there’s no other way someone can have the galls to speak from this side of the aisle—no freaking wayyy!


Edited by coldbrew - 5 years ago
1188351 thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago
#70

Originally posted by: Maroonporsche


Well Kangana called Tapsee Saasti for no reason.

That was Rangoli—Kangana’s sister. Does Alia Bhatt get flak for Pooja Bhatt kissing her dad? They’re sisters too.

Kangana never limits her sister’s freedom of speech despite their provocative nature and the negative reactions they receive. She has gracefully accepted everything that comes her way ... and even takes it for her sister. That’s another sign of class and bravery.


Related Topics

Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: naaznin · 22 days ago

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DUa90YuiRFQ/?igsh=MXEzN2F3bGNxZDYycQ== 😂😂

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DUa90YuiRFQ/
Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: mintyblue · 1 months ago

20 years back....in 2006....with Gangster. So, any thoughts on her initially promising journey which turned to dust?

Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: beena_jon · 1 months ago

(2) Instagram

Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: Rosyme · 2 months ago

Kanagna dancing at neta s daughter wedding https://x.com/ndtv/status/1997536128174616929

https://x.com/ndtv/status/1997536128174616929
Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: oyebollywood · 1 months ago

https://x.com/i/status/2012842443486667217...

https://x.com/i/status/2012842443486667217
Expand ▼
Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".