Originally posted by: HearMeRoar
I get more gay vibes from Arjuna-Krishna. There is a scene between them after war which is quite tender. But then, each seems to show similar tenderness towards women, so who knows?
ETA. I am very supportive of gay rights, so above was not meant as a slight. Moreover, I find Krishna one of the most accepting men in the history of the universe, and I doubt he'd have minded.
If I get reported/banned for this post, so be it.
@ bold. which scene are you talking about?
Ive heard of a scene where krishna lights candles or decorates the room for arjun to lessen his emotional pain which was after abhimanyu vadh i think. Now if anyone does that in todays time it will definitely been seen as gay.😆
ive also read the same interpretation where some people have seen their relationship as romantic. but i think that is because we are conditioned to see in certain ways as to how a Man -man relationship of friendship should be. or that the tenderness and deep love and care is limited only to romantic relationships.
Do you know of queer platonic relationships where the relation is just like life partners but without romantic attraction being involved. I see Madhav - Parth relation as something on those lines. They clearly had a deep platonic attraction going on and even aesthetic attraction too.
Others can have their own interpretation. Nothing wrong in that. And i do agree Krishna was most accepting & challenged old traditions. even Arjun was for that matter and both have taken forms of women one time or the other.
Edited by naq5 - 5 years ago