Mahabharat Retelecast Discussion Thread - Page 41

They are really editing out a lot..

Originally posted by: .Lonewalker.

Umm...hi 😛 I was just wondering that in the dice game, when Yudhishthir started staking his brothers, he started with Nakul & Sahadev and staked Bheem & Arjun later than them. I am curious why so? Devdutt Pattnaik thinks, Yudhishthir probably differentiated between his 2 sets of brothers ( Nakul & Sahadev were his step brothers as they were Madri's son). What's your thought on it? 😆😆 Apart from this gambling thing, are there any other events where Yudhishthir can be seen favouring Bheem & Arjun over Nakul Sahadev?

If this is true, then this guy just got even more pathetic in my eyes 😆

if that was the case then he would not have asked to save nakul or sahadev when his 4 brothers died on the river bed in exile.

i think it was just a case of the younger ones going first

Originally posted by: .Lonewalker.

Lol that was so 🤣

Aham is so good in tonight's episode👏👏

Originally posted by: rmahi25

Her teardrop making his feet stone and kaata proof one naa??

Something of this sort 🤣

Wow, MB getting great rating..

https://twitter.com/GossipsTv/status/1255878711297093633?s=19

Originally posted by: Armu4eva

Aham is so good in tonight's episode👏👏

Kya dikhaya?

Originally posted by: naq5

if that was the case then he would not have asked to save nakul or sahadev when his 4 brothers died on the river bed in exile.

i think it was just a case of the younger ones going first

Well....that thing happened towards the end of their exile & this exile was actually a life changing experience for the Pandavas as in this they experienced & understood things that changed them for better. It's a theory that this exile was like a lesson for them to become better rulers. That's why -

1) Arjun was humbled by Shiva in Archery before he gifted him Pashupatastra. Arjun was egoistic about his legendary skills as an archer & he needed to learn modesty. So Shiva fought him in disguise of a hunter & beat him to teach the much needed modesty.

2) Bheem was humbled by Hanuman for the same reason.

3) Yudhishthir was continuously told stories by sages to make him learn the true form of Dharma.

So.... nearing the end of their exile it's no wonder that Yudhishthir chose Nakul to be fair to Madri. All of them had changed for the better & Yudhishthir too must have learnt to rectify his mistake. Pattnaik actually argues that this choosing Nakul over Bheem or Arjun signifies the change in Yudhishthir & indicates that the exile had served its purpose.

I was asking if there were anymore such incidents before the exile.

Originally posted by: CaptainSpark

Something of this sort 🤣

Originally posted by: .Lonewalker.

Well....that thing happened towards the end of their exile & this exile was actually a life changing experience for the Pandavas as in this they experienced & understood things that changed them for better. It's a theory that this exile was like a lesson for them to become better rulers. That's why -

1) Arjun was humbled by Shiva in Archery before he gifted him Pashupatastra. Arjun was egoistic about his legendary skills as an archer & he needed to learn modesty. So Shiva fought him in disguise of a hunter & beat him to teach the much needed modesty.

2) Bheem was humbled by Hanuman for the same reason.

3) Yudhishthir was continuously told stories by sages to make him learn the true form of Dharma.

So.... nearing the end of their exile it's no wonder that Yudhishthir chose Nakul to be fair to Madri. All of them had changed for the better & Yudhishthir too must have learnt to rectify his mistake. Pattnaik actually argues that this choosing Nakul over Bheem or Arjun signifies the change in Yudhishthir & indicates that the exile had served its purpose.

I was asking if there were anymore such incidents before the exile.