Mahabharat Retelecast Discussion Thread - Page 28

Created

Last reply

Replies

1.1k

Views

44.1k

Users

36

Likes

1.3k

Frequent Posters

CaptainSpark thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: .Lonewalker.

Have you watched them? 😲😲

Only promos. And then I didn't wish to torture myself. But heard of what they showed. AWFUL.

Agni_Jytsona thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: .Lonewalker.

Have you watched them? 😲😲

Karansagini is specifically very bad stay far far away from it. 😆

CaptainSpark thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: .Lonewalker.


While I agree with the most, I actually found SP's representation of the Dice game more sensible than the original story. I know originally Yudhistir didn't need this much manipulation or coercing to put on the stakes & he staked his brothers & wife after losing all his materialistic properties....but this very incident made me dislike Yudhistir as a character & I always thought that after this incident he can never be addressed as the "Dharm Raj". This one incident made him both Adharmi & a terrible King in my eyes. So SP's representation makes more sense if you wish to keep pretending that Yudhistir was the best Ruler for the whole Aryavart to ever have & the flagbearer of "Dharm". By twisting & spinning the Dyut Sabha part like that, I guess they were trying to salvage Yudhistir's character & keep him likeable.


Yeah but that mistake of Yudhi should not be whitewashed just to make him look more flawless is what I felt.

670134 thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: Poorabhforever

Karansagini is specifically very bad stay far far away from it. 😆

I plan to😆 Don't worry😆

670134 thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: CaptainSpark

Only promos. And then I didn't wish to torture myself. But heard of what they showed. AWFUL.

I haven't watched even promos & I like it that way 😆😆

670134 thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: CaptainSpark


Yeah but that mistake of Yudhi should not be whitewashed just to make him look more flawless is what I felt.

If they don't whitewash him, how will they preach that him being the King is "Dharm ka punarsthapan" ? 😆😆 Today's viewers wouldn't accept it. They will give gali. Woh bhi ekdam bhar bharke 😆😆

670134 thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago

Btw I have one curiosity. A bit off topic I know.... But I can't understand it 😆

Why Draupadi's another name was Krishnaa? Because of her dark complexion? But we term dark complexion as "krishna varna" because Lord Krishna had dark complexion, right? Now, Shri Krishna & Arjun were more or less same age.... So Draupadi was not too much younger than Krishna, right? So, at the time of her birth, Shri Krishna couldn't be that famous, could he? So how did she get named after Krishna? 😕


I know thoda ajib question hai....but this happens to me often. I get curious about weird things & keep feeling uneasy until I find a satisfactory answer😆 So if anyone can solve it, please answer.😳

Agni_Jytsona thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: .Lonewalker.

Btw I have one curiosity. A bit off topic I know.... But I can't understand it 😆

Why Draupadi's another name was Krishnaa? Because of her dark complexion? But we term dark complexion as "krishna varna" because Lord Krishna had dark complexion, right? Now, Shri Krishna & Arjun were more or less same age.... So Draupadi was not too much younger than Krishna, right? So, at the time of her birth, Shri Krishna couldn't be that famous, could he? So how did she get named after Krishna? 😕


I know thoda ajib question hai....but this happens to me often. I get curious about weird things & keep feeling uneasy until I find a satisfactory answer😆 So if anyone can solve it, please answer.😳

The term krishna means dark complexion just like sweta means white. So i think both of then were named because of dark complexion. Drapaudi was nor after krishna as Krishna was not a god in his time he was a human like any of us.

670134 thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: Poorabhforever

The term krishna means dark complexion just like sweta means white. So i think both of then were named because of dark complexion. Drapaudi was nor after krishna as Krishna was not a god in his time he was a human like any of us.

Oh 😲 Dude my Hindi is so bad I always thought dark complexion was termed Krishna varna because Lord Krishna's complexion was dark 😆

Thanks for answering😳

Armu4eva thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: rmahi25

Indeed. I used to love their scenes when Nakul & Sehdev used to tease him or vice-versa😆❤️

TBH, I loved Bheem and Panchali bond more as compared to Arjun and Panchali🤔,Idk whyyy!!

I can't say that because I liked Arjun- Subhadra because on the other hand I completely admired Bheem-Hidimba too,they were cute yet funny❤️.

I loved Bheem- Panchali more because he used to support her and make her laugh with his crazy antiques. He used to make efforts for her and cared for her,although all five did but I loved his way more. Only he was the one who genuinely fought the war for Draupadi out of those five. Because the rest four was more inclined towards taking their Rajya back and establishing Dharm apart from fighting those sinner in order to take Draupadi's revenge.


Totally. Bheem-Draupadi were always my fave in the story. It is just that I like watching ShaPoo in SP MB

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".