Originally posted by: LoveInAutumn26
But the thing is why would Sona have to make Naren commit suicide for this? The only way she would have gotten their property is by divorcing Rohit right??? Not after Naren dies?? Makes no sense.
So now why would Sippys ask Rohit to divorce Sona if the prenup says she will get the 80% of property. I mean Sippys are ok letting go of 80 % of their wealth. I am so confused.
Yeah nothing makes sense. I dont understand how they are trying to establish a link between sonakshi's convo with Naren and his 'suicide'. She spoke abt property and how he was not right in his decision to give 50-50 to veena and pooja (which isn't her business to say but anyway that's how she is) But how could such a convo ever spur someone to commit suicide?? Utter rubbish. Writers have gone mad.
And the 80 percent prenup makes no sense either. Everyone knew Naren didn't like sona from the start and was against the marriage. Then why the f would he leave 80 percent of his property to her ?? What are the writers smoking !