In my honest opinion, Kakasa, Narpat, and Samar are all on the same level.
Out of the three, no one is above or below one another.
Kakasa may have done one good thing:
Bringing Saloni home but if you think of it, he only did it because she was carrying Nahar's child. What if she wasn't? Would he still bring her home and make the family accept her?
I believe the answer would be no.
Kakasa has really been getting on my nerves lately because:
1. He is only interested in his family's heir which he presumely thinks is going to be a boy. ๐ก
2. He "convinced" Nahar to remarry to produce a child (which is disgusting if you think about it, marrying someone only for children, not for love or anything๐คข).
Narpat and Samar are just ungrateful. ๐คข
I believe even if Saloni gave her life up for them, they would still find a fault in it.
I find it hard to digest that they can forgive other people, who do things for their own selfish need (Kaveri is the best example๐) but can't forgive the person who puts everything at stake for the wellbeing of others.
Why doesn't Saloni's maakya understand if Nahar and Saloni are back together, there must have been a reason for the change in Saloni and everythings okay?
I have always been told that parents are able to understand and realize their child's happiness and sorrow quicker than anyone but in this case Saloni's parents are an exception๐
And Kaveri, i don't want to get started on her because I may never stop writing๐
Anyways, hope everything ends well๐
We, the viewers, have no option except to wait and watch
Kernal๐
Edited by kernal - 17 years ago