There's a difference between acknowledging Babita's flaws and bashing her outright.
If someone points out a flaw, then often the expectation is that we'd like Babita to learn from her mistakes and correct it, i.e. we are on her team and want her to improve with time so that she can be the best version of herself. Why people fail to see this is beyond me.
I don't see the same outrage when we point out HS' flaws or even Minnie's flaws. How come? Why is there no objection to "HS bashing" or "Minnie bashing" in those cases? Or for that matter Dadu, Beeji, or Lovely, Sukhi, who have so many obvious flaws but are not evil people at all?
Is it because they are less important or because we set different standards for different people?
As a divorced woman who walked out of an abusive marriage I have always understood where Babita is coming from. I started watching this show to join her in her journey towards emancipation, but that doesn't mean I will be blind to her faults and look the other way to pretend they don't exist. I want her to work on them, to acknowledge them, and really move on from her past.
In fact, if you don't point out someone's flaws because you can't be bothered to, then it means that character's arc is not important to you. Have we not seen Kammo's growth as a character? Sure, she is a supporting one, but if you look at her journey it has been quite impressive how an aggressive, narrow-minded, and insensitive woman like her is now a source of support for mother-daughter. We used to point out her mistakes here in the past and now appreciate her for trying to put in effort, and even going against her own husband while staying in her marriage.
Babita hasn't been a good role model to Minnie. So what if we point it out? That's something we want her to work on, not something that will be a permanent fixture in her life. What's wrong with acknowledging that?
In HS' flashbacks and from NB's words we got the message that he was a different person when he married Imarti, he was not so responsible or mature and made lots of mistakes. He was even going to hit her for goodness sake! Look at him today! He worked on himself, constantly tries to improve but when he makes mistakes we point it out.
Why does no one get angry when I say he is wrong to make decisions on behalf of mother-daughter or to be over-protective to the extent that he is, or to assume that Babita will react to things the way he does after he was very harsh with her? These are not simple issues, they are major flaws, yet I don't see the same amount of outrage or people saying that they don't want to debate things or come to the forum because of it.
Edited by inlieu - 6 years ago