Originally posted by: stranger2rose
It’s really sweet on your part to rewrite all the parts that like / appeal to you 😀😀 I’m sure it takes you a long time to type your comment..thanks for putting in so much of effort.
Even I find the bond between Raman and Sia very endearing 🥰 perhaps that’s why I get carried away while writing about them.
Yeah I’ll try to be neutral as writer when it comes to showing Raman as her father..but I can’t say the same about Raman. He considers Sia as her daughter and he has reasons. Remember, the first time when ishita called him as Sia’s Paa..he was surprised..ishita did when she had lost her memory but from there on, Raman has lived that relation..though he thinks he doesn’t deserve to father Ishita’s child but he has..for six months he has loved Sia as his shona , his own child..So even if ishita disapproves or the society fails to accept his bond with Sia, he doesn’t care and will not in future too..his love for Sia doesn’t need anyone’s approval..it’s that deep and thick..today he may not call her shona in Ishita’s presence but tomorrow if he feels like calling her shona he will..if shona escapes his lips unintentionally and unknowingly, he won’t be apologetic..Sorry but I won’t be able to control him. Now for Sia, Raman is Paa..the little one is too young to know the meaning of father..it’s just what she’s been taught to call him..and I agree with you, Raman and Sia don’t need a name for their relationship..💕 it’s not necessary that every bond should have a name
Yeah ishita doesn’t know about his child loss , that’s why she made that remark.
Please never think that your views hurt me😘
🤗
comment:
p_commentcount