Shweta Tiwari files police complaint against husband Abhinav Kohli - Page 14

Seems to me ,shweta ke lawyer ne control karne ko bola her PR which were spreading that he had molested her daughter . Hence the clarification .

Abhinav Kohli should get a good lawyer too .

Damn, that's really sad.she would have to go through the whole divorce and custody cycle again.

Originally posted by: YoWorld

Damn, that's really sad.she would have to go through the whole divorce and custody cycle again.

More sad for the kid.

Originally posted by: LoveInAutumn26

This is what Palak posted on her insta about this

https://www.instagram.com/p/B1Eo9M1noVE/

Tight slap to those who called me a Misogynist for asking people NOT to jump into conclusion. How many times have Misandrists in this forums been made to eat their own words after asking for blood of men without hearing them out is there for all to see.

The problem is not with the world but your own mentality that always jumps to conclusion without basic sense of justice n neutrality to HEAR both sides first. Am still waiting to hear the Husband's side.

Originally posted by: bingyy

U cannot compare malaika arbaaz case with sweta Tiwari case because clearly Malaika had affair with arjun thats why they got divorced..Here Sweta didnt have any affair..her daughter got indirectly sexually abused by her step father...thats very very serious and very common everywhere.

I think u shud read what i wrote and then talk. I compared Hrithik case with Malaika. Not Shweta. Nor Malaika case with Shweta. I only pointed out that when a Man gets divorced, he is always blamed. When a woman gets divorced even for her open philandering, the husband gets blamed again in this forum. I am not responsible for your twisted misinterpretations.

Originally posted by: AllThatCritique

There is way to ask that without character shaming and victim blaming the woman. Calling her a loser for marrying abusers. Saying she comes with Raja Chaudhary baggage and a new husband is some kinda devta to ignore that baggage or burden and did a favour by marrying an abused woman. They are not JUST asking for the other side. Lets not be blind.

AGAIN. Victim is decided AFTER hearing both sides. Is it SO tough to understand this simple logic? And why cannot she be called loser or controversial if her husbands are called gold diggers n flops? U can character shame a guy of serious crime without hearing him out, mock another person for asking to hear other side and then character shame entire Desi men in your comments but i cannot name call one controversial woman?

Yes, She may hv been a victim in Raja Chaudhary case. That does not make her automatic victim of this case too. We HAVE to hear other side. No amount of whataboutery is going to change this BASIC thing. HEAR BOTH SIDES. And nobody needs your fake support for Hrithik. Looking at ur illogical arguments, am 100% sure u must hv blamed n asked for his blood initially too and later supported him reluctantly when PROOF came on ur face. And now using his name to hide your Blatant Misandristic views. Keep your support to yourself. He does not need any support when Truth is on his side.

And yes, Hrithik also comes with a Baggage of his Ex wife and Two kids. I think this is a line which everyone uses here when talking about his dating life. Anybody who dates him with have to adjust with his past and deal with his children. People say the same even about Katrina due to her Baggage of Ex boyfriend Salman and RK - not to forget people dragging her family background. Ranbir is also said to be bad choice by many here due to his Baggage of dating history. So, why cannot the same be used for the case of this woman? Hypocrisy at its best.

This young single man did not need to marry some one who already had a daughter. Just like no single woman is obliged to marry a divorced man with kids. It is not something all men or women in this country do it. More so in the case of men. He was clearly open minded to do it. So, i dont think he is that bad as he is made out to be. So, i would want to hear HIS side before calling him a child molester/abuser/etc. That is a BIG allegation. And i also know how many domestic laws are misused by women in this country to settle scores to believe anything that gets written in favor of a woman BLINDLY. Since u quote statistics, go do some research on how many times Section 498A is misused by women. The case even reached SC and is up for debate.

Thunderlight carrying men rights in the forum[insert proud smiley]

Mid Day Article not naming any one

TV actor and father blames actress ex-wife for their daughter being molested

TV star's first husband tells mid-day he found the second husband, now accused of molesting the daughter, touching her inappropriately as far back as 2010

https://www.mid-day.com/articles/tv-actor-and-father-blames-actress-ex-wife-for-their-daughter-being-molested/21527155

Originally posted by: ThunderLight

AGAIN. Victim is decided AFTER hearing both sides. Is it SO tough to understand this simple logic? And why cannot she be called loser or controversial if her husbands are called gold diggers n flops? U can character shame a guy of serious crime without hearing him out, mock another person for asking to hear other side and then character shame entire Desi men in your comments but i cannot name call one controversial woman?

Yes, She may hv been a victim in Raja Chaudhary case. That does not make her automatic victim of this case too. We HAVE to hear other side. No amount of whataboutery is going to change this BASIC thing. HEAR BOTH SIDES. And nobody needs your fake support for Hrithik. Looking at ur illogical arguments, am 100% sure u must hv blamed n asked for his blood initially too and later supported him reluctantly when PROOF came on ur face. And now using his name to hide your Blatant Misandristic views. Keep your support to yourself. He does not need any support when Truth is on his side.

And yes, Hrithik also comes with a Baggage of his Ex wife and Two kids. I think this is a line which everyone uses here when talking about his dating life. People say the same even about Katrina due to her Baggage of Ex boyfriend Salman and RK - not to forget people dragging her family background. Ranbir is also said to be bad choice by many here due to his Baggage of dating history. So, why cannot the same be used for the case of this woman? Hypocrisy at its best

You are absolutely right about hearing both sides of the story..Even on hearing one side it Can be said he didn't hit or abuse Shweta..But he did cause trauma to Palak..

But u cannot assume he is a good guy just coz he married Shweta..It doesn't make him a saint to marry someone with a 'baggage'. They worked together and liked each other hence married..No one did a favour to the other. Shweta is n independent strong woman ..Don't thing anyone needed to do any mercy on her by marrying. There r many people who don't have the good luck of having a happy peaceful life..She is one of them..Can't call her a loser for that..

Even Raja didn't come across as a completely bad guy on BB..But it's just that he had a volatile personality..Shweta is headstrong. It didn't work for them.

But her kids mean the world to her..Don't know how this case will unfold

Originally posted by: niyati13

You are absolutely right about hearing both sides of the story..Even on hearing one side it Can be said he didn't hit or abuse Shweta..But he did cause trauma to Palak..

But u cannot assume he is a good guy just coz he married Shweta..It doesn't make him a saint to marry someone with a 'baggage'. They worked together and liked each other hence married..No one did a favour to the other. Shweta is n independent strong woman ..Don't thing anyone needed to do any mercy on her by marrying. There r many people who don't have the good luck of having a happy peaceful life..She is one of them..Can't call her a loser for that..

Even Raja didn't come across as a completely bad guy on BB..But it's just that he had a volatile personality..Shweta is headstrong. It didn't work for them.

But her kids mean the world to her..Don't know how this case will unfold

It definitely takes a large hearted man or woman to marry someone who is not just divorced but also has a child from previous marriage. Many would like to marry only Single persons. For sake of political correctness, let us not hide away the ground reality. And that applies to even anybody who wants to marry Hrithik too (since people think making digs at him will dilute my point) as he also comes with two children from previous marriage. It is not a easy decision to take for anybody.

And in India, it is even more rare for Single men to marry divorced women with children. I am not saying he is great but i am only saying that he is not MCP that is being made out. I am also not saying he is innocent. But, i would like to understand what exactly took place from his side first before calling him a child abuser/molester/wife beater etc.

Children are as much loved by Fathers as by Mothers. And when marriage breaks down, it is not always fault of only one gender. It takes two hands to clap. Men always have to deal with separation of their kids in divorce due to Pro women laws. Time for people to stop villifying one gender and worshipping the other gender BLINDLY.