Kangana candid confession 2018 interview

Loved this one , talks about Nationalism, defence, love, Se* and Nepotism.

Watch the part in the end where she talks about nationalism

Kangana the pseudo nationalist, supporting the ban on Pakistani artists earning off Indians


But here is kangana modeling for a Pakistani designer label
🤣
I guess if some of that money is going into her pocket then it's fine.

It has become kangana forum instead of Bollywood forum 😆

Clearly she knows the questions in advance (see "fear question) and mostly sounds like rehearsed prepared Kangana sounds - good, no one can say she's not good with a script. I did think it was interesting how relieved she seemed that "by the grace of God she was not in jail and how she answered the inevitable Hrithik question (~25:20 in video). Kangana believers...imagine (just imagine) Hrithik is telling the truth, hold that idea in your mind and watch the answer she gives here. Either way it's nice to see he is slowly be returned to reality in her mind. A couple of years ago he was the love of her life she traveled great distances for, in this video he's just someone she was over in a couple of months and then in love with the next guy (spoiler - same result he thought she was a psycho - her word), and in the recent Arnab interview, he's just a colleague who accused her of stalking and harassment.

Originally posted by: Rabrakha

It has become kangana forum instead of Bollywood forum 😆

Right now I might even find rakhi sawant more interesting😆

Originally posted by: Nova19

Clearly she knows the questions in advance (see "fear question) and mostly sounds like rehearsed prepared Kangana sounds - good, no one can say she's not good with a script. I did think it was interesting how relieved she seemed that "by the grace of God she was not in jail and how she answered the inevitable Hrithik question (~25:20 in video). Kangana believers...imagine (just imagine) Hrithik is telling the truth, hold that idea in your mind and watch the answer she gives here. Either way it's nice to see he is slowly be returned to reality in her mind. A couple of years ago he was the love of her life she traveled great distances for, in this video he's just someone she was over in a couple of months and then in love with the next guy (spoiler - same result he thought she was a psycho - her word), and in the recent Arnab interview, he's just a colleague who accused her of stalking and harassment.

I agree to disagree. Even on Nationalism they said we were talking earlier... it is not uncommon for interviewer and interviewee to discuss questions and I don't really have much of a problem with that. It's the lack of follow up questions. For example she was asked how much it must have hurt when Hrithik "let her down ", Kangana started talking about the boy she loved at 16 and then the man she loved 2 months after whatever happened with Hrithik, etc. The very obvious follow up question would have been so was it really love or infatuation/obsession. If it wasn't real love (or even if it was) why talk about it for years if you were moving on to the next guy 2 months later? Equally important questions would be, since you are prepared to make allegations about this man and discuss your own private life including vaginal cameras and semen why not clear up all the different stories, what exactly happened, were you actually physical lovers, were you engaged (when and where)? He says you never met privately, did you (when and where)? If the interviewer isn't prepared to ask serious follow up questions, then she shouldn't ask the first question. In case you haven't figured it out, Kangana didn't name names on Republic because she quickly figured out those interviewers were going to ask the hard to follow up questions.

Originally posted by: Nova19

I agree to disagree. Even on Nationalism they said we were talking earlier... it is not uncommon for interviewer and interviewee to discuss questions and I don't really have much of a problem with that. It's the lack of follow up questions. For example she was asked how much it must have hurt when Hrithik "let her down ", Kangana started talking about the boy she loved at 16 and then the man she loved 2 months after whatever happened with Hrithik, etc. The very obvious follow up question would have been so was it really love or infatuation/obsession. If it wasn't real love (or even if it was) why talk about it for years if you were moving on to the next guy 2 months later? Equally important questions would be, since you are prepared to make allegations about this man and discuss your own private life including vaginal cameras and semen why not clear up all the different stories, what exactly happened, were you actually physical lovers, were you engaged (when and where)? He says you never met privately, did you (when and where)? If the interviewer isn't prepared to ask serious follow up questions, then she shouldn't ask the first question. In case you haven't figured it out, Kangana didn't name names on Republic because she quickly figured out those interviewers were going to ask the hard to follow up questions.