INNER VOICES 21.2
🏏ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2026: S8 - M41: New Zealand vs Pakistan🏏
•• Kyunki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi 2 ~ Chat Club #2 ••
🏏ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2026 M40: AUS vs OMA at Pallekele🏏
O Romeo emerges a FLOP
Shahid Kapoor Questions Credibility of Critics
MUKTI vs MAIRA 22.2
Gift of Giving: A Creative Writing Contest: WINNER ANNOUNCEMENT
Kalyug ka Parshuram ~ Shivprasad Deshmukh || Neil Bhatt AT
Originally posted by: Too_Much
Sridevi was full time available here..Madhuri is not and secondly, i dont think she likes to do films like EV or others which Sri did.
But she was always on tv. Literally every talent show & award show, did item songs. She did something like dead ishqya and gulab gang or something. She was overexposed when she arrived like SRK's 90's loverboy image and nothing worked.
Sri was reserved and made sensible choice and got commercial and critical success. Kalank was just business arrangements for Sri which madz got but won't do any good for her.
Originally posted by: Ratukrus
I feel Sri would have benefitted more with Kalank because after a long time audiences would have seen her in a glamourous dancing avtaar. Madhuri we have already seen do Dedh Ishqiya in a similar type of getup and dance numbers.
Originally posted by: Shaitan-Haiwan
The only difference is that Sridevi is actually talented and Madhuri isn't lol
Madhuri can step in but she can never fill those shoes
...
...
https://www.mid-day.com/entertainment/bollywood-news/article/boney-kapoor-moves-to-madras-hc-over-claims-on-sridevi-chennai-property-23591183
https://www.reddit.com/r/BollyBlindsNGossip/comments/1lmjzz0/vicky_kaushal_says_katrina_gives_him_honest/?rdt=56968...
https://youtu.be/rSTk9KgrJ3w?si=HlodlfGaJ_hYLnn7
0