If what Sree Said is justifies according to the posts on fourm. - Page 2

Originally posted by: lostloveforever

Surabhi has no character, zilch...if one acts in a certain way which is uniquely identifiable to a certain group, and is unashamedly portraying such actions, why is it that the other person has to wash the image coming up in his mind and not articulate it...oh ya...may sound offensive ..when one has no shame acting a certain way, why should other be shamed for articulating it..

Originally posted by: SP2684

Uniquely identifiable to a certain group? In whose view? Sreesanth's and yours - not fact by any means. And he absolutely thought that Surbhi deserves to be likened to a prostitute - that's why he said it. And it is offensive - it does demean her, and in my view she did not deserve that in the slightest. That is why Bb and Sallu, who baby this man to no end, also didn't let this go without mention - though they still treated it and him with kid gloves - because they knew that would look bad and receive backlash.

And I'm not just shaming him for articulating it - I think he should be ashamed of his soch. But he's clearly not, and that is not surprising to me given what he's displayed of his mindset across the season. Shame his sister and chief supporter Dipika doesn't agree with the view that Surbhi's behaviour deserved what he said, and therefore his comment was totally cool - poor thing couldn't bring herself to repeat her brother's oh so lovely and fully justified remark.

Originally posted by: lostloveforever

Well, please don't bring Sallu's sense of judgement any further in any of interaction, thanks! Yes, her actions resembled a certain group...Dipika has inhibition of her image for this show, I'm not constrained by such niceties.

Rest is your opinion only, can't comment on that.