Ranibir's acting in Sanju - Page 4

Created

Last reply

Replies

36

Views

2.8k

Users

21

Likes

44

Frequent Posters

AllThatCritique thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 7 years ago
#31

Originally posted by: Bollywoodlaver


and keeping arms equals to being part of bombay blasts? very good, please tell the same to the supreme court, and believe it or not everyone in bollywood was in contact with the underworld, they used to call for ransom or they used to produce their movies, why target only sanju? there is no proof of him being part of any terrorist activity, end of story. Why can't people believe he was innocent? what will the makers get out of lying? what will they achieve? he has already been acquitted from the terrorism charges, it is not like the movie was made to help him escape anything! Maybe people should use some common sense before they buy anything that a certain section of media sells to them!


Oh lord. Are you serious? The makers are his own goddamn friends. Also didn't Hirani admit that he changed scenes to create more empathy for Sanjay ? They have zero legs to stand on after a statement like that. And for god's sake stop this whataboutism. Yeah the movie industry and the underworld is linked but surprisingly only Sanjay had the guns. And not one like in the movie. He partied with these peeps. Read up. Also come talk to me when an unbiased source who doesn't confess to changing up the script to make a criminal look good makes a movie on Sanjay. They did a whole image cleaning with the movie. I have lost someone in the blasts so don't tell me owning guns and hobnobbing with terrorists meant nothing. There is a line to be drawn between being a blind stan and having the faculty to understand where the blind stanship ends.
Bollywoodlaver thumbnail
6th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago
#32

Originally posted by: AllThatCritique


Oh lord. Are you serious? The makers are his own goddamn friends. Also didn't Hirani admit that he changed scenes to create more empathy for Sanjay ? They have zero legs to stand on after a statement like that. And for god's sake stop this whataboutism. Yeah the movie industry and the underworld is linked but surprisingly only Sanjay had the guns. And not one like in the movie. He partied with these peeps. Read up. Also come talk to me when an unbiased source who doesn't confess to changing up the script to make a criminal look good makes a movie on Sanjay. They did a whole image cleaning with the movie. I have lost someone in the blasts so don't tell me owning guns and hobnobbing with terrorists meant nothing. There is a line to be drawn between being a blind stan and having the faculty to understand where the blind stanship ends.


yes they are his friends, so?? it is not like they are his family and they have some kind of responsibility to make a fake whitewashed story on him??? hirani and vidhu are good people, extremely moral, especially hirani and thats why they are friends with sanju, who they have always claimed is a nice person.

NO HIRANI ADMITTED TO ADDING MORE SCENES USING MORE OF SANJAY DUTT'S ANECDOTES, HE DID NOT SAY CHANGE ANY SCENE, FRANKLY PEOPLE LIKE YOU WHO CANNOT READ PROPERLY AND INTERPRET THINGS ARE THE KIND OF PEOPLE WHO HAVE NO LEG TO STAND ON! AND WHEN DID HRIANI SAY THAT HE CHANGED FACTS TO MAKE SANJAY DUTT SEEM INNOCENT IN THE BOMBAY BLASTS CASE?? NOT ONCE, HE STICKS BY THE FACT THAT SANJAY DUTT IS INNOCENT 100% AND SO DOES THE SUPREME COURT, I AM SORRY BUT NO ONE WAS MURDERED BY THAT AK56 FOUND IN DUTT'S HOUSE, SO YEH LEARN TO USE SOME COMMON SENSE, THERE IS NO LINK BETWEEN THE TWO, THE GUNS WERE DELIVERED AFTER THE BLASTS ANYWAY! HE WAS A GUN ENTHUSIAST, EVERYONE KNOWS, DOESN'T MAKE HIM A TERRORIST.



Edited by Bollywoodlaver - 7 years ago
adventurousman thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 7 years ago
#33
Bollywood lover: let them bash Sanju, it doesn't matter. We can't change anyone's mind. Let them believe what they want to believe.

Before the release and during it, i made topics on Sanju clarifying all his cases. No one had any proof. They still don't. They even showed his exact confession to the police, that was his real confession in 93. Those were the guns he took. There was no truck, no involvement with the blasts nor was he aware but people will believe what they want to believe in. All Bollywood was in touch with underworld, did movies for them even payed them ransom.

So of course Sanju was friendly with them like the rest. He liked guns and took them. We know he's not the sharpest tool out there so he didn't know where they're coming from.

Even if we say he knew, he still wouldn't do it because at the end of the day everyone wants to save their ass. Why would he help dawood when he knows tomorrow it can bite him in the ass + why would they trust a movie star

Also as you've said it was because of sunil dutt politics.

Anyways doesn't matter

Movie is atbb, people went to watch it because of Sanjus story + Hirani + rk

Rk did an awesome job and looks like it'll be the hgoty

+ he'll get all the awards

other fandoms will of course criticize the movie, rk, Sanju, nothing new

This is all a waste of time. They don't deserve it, let it be
Bollywoodlaver thumbnail
6th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago
#34

Originally posted by: adventurousman

Bollywood lover: let them bash Sanju, it doesn't matter. We can't change anyone's mind. Let them believe what they want to believe.

Before the release and during it, i made topics on Sanju clarifying all his cases. No one had any proof. They still don't. They even showed his exact confession to the police, that was his real confession in 93. Those were the guns he took. There was no truck, no involvement with the blasts nor was he aware but people will believe what they want to believe in. All Bollywood was in touch with underworld, did movies for them even payed them ransom.

So of course Sanju was friendly with them like the rest. He liked guns and took them. We know he's not the sharpest tool out there so he didn't know where they're coming from.

Even if we say he knew, he still wouldn't do it because at the end of the day everyone wants to save their ass. Why would he help dawood when he knows tomorrow it can bite him in the ass + why would they trust a movie star

Also as you've said it was because of sunil dutt politics.

Anyways doesn't matter

Movie is atbb, people went to watch it because of Sanjus story + Hirani + rk

Rk did an awesome job and looks like it'll be the hgoty

+ he'll get all the awards

other fandoms will of course criticize the movie, rk, Sanju, nothing new

This is all a waste of time. They don't deserve it, let it be


it is shocking how so many don't even know this, he was totally used as a scapegoat owing to dirty politics, yeh I am gonna let it be, I know so many people who love and respect sanjay dutt, and who only went to watch it for him and absolutely loved it, I don't care for opinions of pseudo-intellects who like to believe the worst just by assuming all the crap the media sells, his stardom and the movie's success is a big enough slap for the haters! Everyone i know loves him and adores him! I can only laugh at people who think that this movie could be a huge success if it was based on any other lallu panju! The movie was below average, the only selling point was the fact that it is a real story of a Superstar!

by the way have you watched this?

[YOUTUBE]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmlYZZiRm5w[/YOUTUBE]
Edited by Bollywoodlaver - 7 years ago
blue-ice. thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Achiever Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 7 years ago
#35
STOP ABUSING MEMBERS👎🏼
1098676 thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago
#36
I don't understand how Ranbir was playing a caricature of Dutt according to some people. I think people who say that must had already made up their mind before watching the movie, that he is Ranbir Kapoor, not Sanjay Dutt. Of course he is Ranbir and he can't replace the original, but he did come quite close. How exactly it was a caricature? Baba's most popular persona among the audience is of Munna Bhai, and Ranbir was nowhere acting like Munna Bhai in the first half of the movie, I.e. his drug addiction phase. Infact, the movie also showed the other side of Sanjay Dutt, and not of a macho man that is popular in the public. Now people will say that, aha, so he was playing himself and not Sanjay Dutt. Well, you can't have your cake and it too.
And what walking problem? It's a signature walk of Baba, and people definitely don't think that he has some walking problem.



nitritt9s thumbnail
8th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago
#37
ranbir was n is always brilliant in every role he plays be it in barfi jawani dewanee ajab prem ki gazab kahani n in sunju he was excellent thats my opinion

Related Topics

Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: elaichichai · 1 months ago

https://x.com/i/status/2007418899567186346

https://x.com/i/status/2007418899567186346
Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: WhipCreamThong · 4 months ago

Should Sidharth Malhotra just quit acting? Time for Sidharth Malhotra to quit acting for real. Another flop by him with Param Sundari. Maybe he...

Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: WhipCreamThong · 3 months ago

I can name so many and some of the biggest fans on this forum will be insecure, but I say Aishwarya Rai Dhoom 2 takes the award from me for the...

Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: WhipCreamThong · 4 months ago

Another example of someone who gets movies despite a million flops. Varun is so blah. I used to find him hot and good looking, but not anymore....

Expand ▼
Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".