Being in love justifies EMA? - Page 2

But I don't think it's as if EMA can't ever be justified,like what if your spouse is really abusive (like rajdeep) in that case I don't think a justification of EMA will even be needed.Kunal and nandini have wronged mauli,I don't think it's a sin if they have "wronged" somebody like rajdeep.

Sometimes even if the spouse is not extremely abusive you can see why the person would get involved with someone else,what if you were young when you got married and you gave years to your marriage but you don't find that compatibility,your interests don't match at all,your spouse hasn't cared or stood up for you in front of their family and society when some standing up was really required?In that case some/many will not care if they are committing any "sin" and will only care about getting as much happiness as they can for the remaining years of their lives.It is only human and I personally wouldn't begrudge it.Of course one can always get out of a marriage but can one really?It is easier said than done,getting a divorce.

Some platonic relationships between man and woman could really be refreshing for indian tv,I really liked kunal-nandini-mauli's scenes when the former two had developed no romantic feelings for each other,like the bucket list one which had more wishes of kunal than nandini's and mauli's reaction when she read the list.Such scenes were so likeable that I found myself wishing that their dynamics would never change,that kunal nandini would develop a wonderful platonic bond and then I would remind myself that it isn't what the story is about and the dynamics will change😆

Morally ema is wrong.

That's it.

Agar pyar hai to go and confess.

Don't play dandia behind back