What's your verdict Forumwasiyon? Be the jury, the court is on!! - Page 4

For me , everything is going good. Siddhant is still that Siddhant with a new version i.e Siddhant-Prabhakr-Sinha. it's his inner self talking of 'sahi tareeka'. Here , sahi tareeka means 'thinking of the outcomes and what will it leads to. Prabhakar wouldn't have even taken revenge , if he was in place of Sid. He would have waited for either karma , or look out for more evidences against KK which would have taken ages to punish KK. But Sid knows , evidences are half , so better destroy the enemy and make him feel the pain in return - tit for tat , but by choosing the right path.

Originally posted by: noexcuse

Isn't it too early to say his swagger is gone. I want to give him a chance till the maternity case thingy works out...so, let me wait.

Originally posted by: shruti3rdsingh

For me , everything is going good. Siddhant is still that Siddhant with a new version i.e Siddhant-Prabhakr-Sinha. it's his inner self talking of 'sahi tareeka'. Here , sahi tareeka means 'thinking of the outcomes and what will it leads to. Prabhakar wouldn't have even taken revenge , if he was in place of Sid. He would have waited for either karma , or look out for more evidences against KK which would have taken ages to punish KK. But Sid knows , evidences are half , so better destroy the enemy and make him feel the pain in return - tit for tat , but by choosing the right path.

In the game of revenge , he was ready to go jail (the talk with Sudhanshu) , meet Mikhail vohra as Anu did told him he isn't a right person , he was litteraly adding fuel to the fire (breaking Reddys) which was affecting Anushka also - these sums up he wasn't thinking of the outcomes what it was leading to . But now, he knows what he's doing and what will be the result, and that's why he himself has decided to tell Anushka the truth coz hiding such a big thing will lead to something more bad.

Let KK do something bad, either Sid will handle in his own way but with a hold on his principles or maybe Anushka will come in the picture to save Sid just like the jail scenario , and KK have to loose in front of his daughter.

since initial days , I neither sided with Sid nor Prabhakar fully. For me it was all about their clashes , their POVs and approach towards handling things , the unspoken bond they shared.

Loved the all the points of everyone! Great discussion. But I agree with Aayushi's post! :)

I think we haven't seen Sidhant Prabhakar Sinha in action yet...Yes he has been gathering evidence and all, but we are yet to see what he does with those evidences and to what extenthe can hurt KK and to what extent his morality extends

Excellent thread, thanks for opening it Padma.

Something from one of my all time favourite films, A Few Good Men

Originally posted by: peachesnplums

Something from one of my all time favourite films, A Few Good Men

Novice lawyer Daniel Kaffee (Tom Cruise 😉) talks to his assistant Weinberg (another lawyer), about his father Lionel Kaffee, who was a great lawyer and what his father would've done -

Weinberg: I ever tell you I wrote a paper about your father in college?

Kaffee: Yeah?

Weinberg: One of the best trial lawyers ever.

Kaffee: Yes, he was.

Weinberg: And if I were Dawson and Downey and I had a choice between you or your father to represent me in this case, I'd choose you any day of the week and twice on Sunday. You should've seen yourself thunder away at Kendrick.

Kaffee: Would you put Jessup on the stand?

Weinberg: No.

Kaffee: You think my father would've?

Weinberg: With the evidence we got? Not in a million years. But here's the thing and there's really no getting around this: neither Lionel Kaffee nor Sam Weinberg are lead counsel in the matter of US versus Dawson and Downey. So there's really only one question: what would you do?

Eagerly waiting to find out what Sid would do :)

Originally posted by: peachesnplums

Something from one of my all time favourite films, A Few Good Men

Novice lawyer Daniel Kaffee (Tom Cruise 😉) talks to his assistant Weinberg (another lawyer), about his father Lionel Kaffee, who was a great lawyer and what his father would've done -

Weinberg: I ever tell you I wrote a paper about your father in college?

Kaffee: Yeah?

Weinberg: One of the best trial lawyers ever.

Kaffee: Yes, he was.

Weinberg: And if I were Dawson and Downey and I had a choice between you or your father to represent me in this case, I'd choose you any day of the week and twice on Sunday. You should've seen yourself thunder away at Kendrick.

Kaffee: Would you put Jessup on the stand?

Weinberg: No.

Kaffee: You think my father would've?

Weinberg: With the evidence we got? Not in a million years. But here's the thing and there's really no getting around this: neither Lionel Kaffee nor Sam Weinberg are lead counsel in the matter of US versus Dawson and Downey. So there's really only one question: what would you do?

Eagerly waiting to find out what Sid would do :)