Originally posted by: BollyGlitz
The career span of Sonakshi and Kriti is completely different. Sonakshi made her debut in 2010 and of course she got a lot of opportunities to prove herself so even if she did manage to give a good performance not a big deal. Kriti is proving her mettle on her own so she didn't have a lot of doors opening for her. Comparing two performances is absurd as the films are completely different.
sorry but Sonakshi proved herself from the first movie itself.
She held her own against a tour de force character like
Chulbul Pandey.
Let us not use the ghisa pita Alia card(that even after terrible debut, Alia got Highway
and improved because of million chances) for Sonakshi.
Because unlike Alia, Sonakshi was never a bad actor, and
She was excellent from her first movie and also gained a following with males because of her gaon ki gori look.
Her problem was wrong choice of movies, not that she did million movies
and finally improved in Lootera. She was mostly doing flowerpot roles before Lootera, which rarely give
chance to showcase the full picture of the promise she showed in Dabbang.
And performance like Lootera is a big deal, it is not just a mere
good performance, mere good performances is what Kriti did in BKB, it was an outstanding performance sadly robbed of awards because
Lootera was a box office failure.
Also yes Kriti is doing an admirable job, and it is
nice to see her have an organic growth but to praise I will not belittle the likes of
Sonakshi or Alia. You guys make it like since Kriti gave an 8/10 performance in
Bkb, she should praised more than Sonakshi in Lootera(10/10 performance) because former is outsider and latter is star kid.
Also it was you who started the comparisions by calling out
Sonakshi in this thread, not me.
93