A fitting reply to Swara Bhaskar.

Penkie06 thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 7 years ago
#1

Dear Swara, at the end of your rant, I felt you should rise above your Vagina perhaps

Dear Swara Bhaskar,

I read your rant against Sanjay Leela Bhansali's Padmaavat, which despite so many obstacles, finally saw the light of the day. I understand your anger against glorifying jauhar', i.e. committing suicide rather than get yourselves raped by barbaric invaders who want to keep you as sex slave and force religious conversions on you, because of course women are more than their societal conditioning of honour'.

Having said that, you being a Sociology graduate from one of the most prestigious universities of India, let me remind you of your views on cinematic depiction of a love-obsessed man who fell in love with an unattainable girl, who does not give in to his advances. You glorified stalking, a crime numerous women are victim of, and called it an unapologetic celebration of crazy love'. You dismissed the criticism for the film Raanjhanaa, which brought stalking alive on the celluloid and you justified it by saying he was rendered endearing in his nave innocence'. If stalking can be dismissed so casually by you because of creative freedom director of a movie has taken, what makes you so woke' about women's rights now?

One could argue that people grow, and your views from 2013 may have matured. That as an alumnus of JNU and daughter of Ira Bhaskar, who teaches cinema studies in JNU and was also on the Censor Board (I am sure you have achieved all that you have in the film industry on your own and your Censor Board member mother had absolutely nothing to do with it), your thoughts would evolve. But when you invoke your inner feminist while saying Bhansali glorified jauhar and that women have a right to live, you also forget that women have a right notto be raped. The right to not spend the life as a sex slave of a barbaric invader who was also violently forcing religious conversions.

Choosing death over honour' is nothing to be proud of. But if only in the 13th century, there were Internet Feminists who would run hashtags. If only people took to Jantar Mantar or Parliament Street and stood with placards asking barbaric Mughal invaders to go back because #NotOurInvader. If only the Islamic invaders didn't think women are slaves and raping them, constantly, repeatedly, brutally, is their right because they have conquered' them. If only in the 13th century, women had known that in the 21st century, their cinematic depiction' would lead to a fifth wave of feminism where open letters would try to imply how the fact that they would rather die than spend life as sex slave is a bigger crime' than beastly Islamic invaders who destroyed civilizations and murdered people along the way.

While there is no pride in choosing death over honour', a period film based on the 13th century, you cannot deny these things did exist. Such films will have problematic, politically incorrect portrayal of society because a practice like Jauhar existed not because Hindus were patriarchal, but because Islamic invaders took interest in raping and treating enemy women as sex slaves and conquests. Depicting them is not glorifying. Glorifying is when open letters downplay the brutality of Islamic invaders under the veil of feminism.

So, next time you sit on high pedestal and go about virtue signalling everyone with your feminist-than-thou views, try not to compare 13th century practices with 21st century evils. And while you are at it, try not to justify 21st century crimes like stalking as per your convenience.

And since you felt reduced to a vagina, here's a way to redeem yourself. While Padmaavat may be based on a 13th century Islamic invasion, there are some brutes even in 21st century who believe in maintaining sex slaves. You may want to talk to the Yazidi sex slaves who were raped by ISIS predators. Yes, they have a life beyond rapes, but the focal point should be the fact that the brutal rapes are happening. That these women are kept as sex slaves. And that some of these women, chose not to be enslaved and violated in the most brutal manner over and over again, but perhaps, would choose death.

Perhaps the film Padmaavat made you feel reduced to a vagina because that's what the barbaric invaders like Khilji thought of women. In which case, I think Bhansali did a phenomenal job in bringing out the cinematic depiction of history.

I hope you rise above your hypocrisy and perceived political correctness.

Sincerely,

Nirwa Narayan-Sharma

Desirous of truth

Created

Last reply

Replies

5

Views

993

Users

6

Likes

15

Frequent Posters

SluttySavitri thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 7 years ago
#2
Jitna zieda ye apne open letters mein likhte han utna meine kabhi exam mein nahi likha hoga.
Zeal17 thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago
#3
Attack her message, and not her identity. Gosh! le lo uski..
beingsirius thumbnail
8th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago
#4
What has civilization been reduced to-debating the finer points of life as a sex slave over death. That;s what happens when liberal snowflakes are given platforms.
707793 thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago
#5

An open letter to all Vaginas

28JAN

Feminism: The advocacy of woman's rights on the ground of the equality of the sexes.

Now that's the dictionary definition of the word. But how can anyone advocate about equality of the sexes'? A woman has a vagina, the door to life. It has the power to procure life', which no man, however hard he tries, can ever do. The question of equality is settled there, once and for all.

There are some film-makers, artists, actors who feel they are the torch-bearers of feminism' in the new-age cinema.

So here is what the true' & real' depiction of feminism in recent films A woman, betrayed by the lover/groom picks up a bottle of alcohol and walks the streets while an old hindi' song plays in the background...she managed to something that men have been doing when betrayed. So that's equality. Men 10 women 1 (the films have just begun to become progressive so please don't mind the score). Just forgot to mention, in the same movie a dialogue goes "Jab aadmi aurat se pareshaan hota hai ye daaru hi usey sahara deti hai. Isi liye shadi ke baad har mard peeta hai, biwi chillaati rehti hai par aadmi ka gham kaun samjhe (This is the gist of the dialogue, not the exact dialogue)

In a recent short film, a woman, tired of doing the daily chores in the kitchen, pulls a chair and begins to sip on juice (a la her husband and other men'). Equality achieved. Men-10... women 2

In another film a daughter smokes and shares a cigarette with her father (which only a boy could do till now) is lauded and celebrated as feminism. Equality again. Men -10 Women 3

Now coming to the people who found Padmaavat regressive and found their feminism challenged by it.

Did they feel like a vagina' when Rani Padmaavati almost orders her husband, who obliges, to throw out the lecherous priest? She takes a decision, as a vagina.

Did they feel like a vagina' when Rani Padmaavati decides to show her face to Khilji in a mirror? Though it was her decision, as a vagina.

Did they feel like a vagina' when Rani Padmaavati goes to rescue' her husband who had been abducted? Again, a decision against the system, as a vagina.

They must have felt like a vagina' when she chose fire' over rape'? It was her call', her decision' as a vagina. Right, wrong, strong, weak is up to you to interpret as a penis' or as a vagina'.

The word feminism is so misused and so mis-interpreted off late that it feels like an abuse. To women, to the vagina'... to the great feminine power. To the only gender that has the power to procure life.

Films, ads, opinions that portray women doing things that men do are lauded and celebrated as feminist'. Feminism is reduced to women smoking, drinking, gambling etc on screen. Abey aadmi toh hamesha se f**ked-up' rahe. Ab auratein equality ke chakkar mein f**ked-up' ho gayi. Ho gaya feminism. Men 10. Women -10. Lo daal lo equality jahan daalni hai.

Yes, women were repressed and India was patriarchal, it still is. But feminism is not about women doing things that men do.

Feminism is about taking a stand. Taking a decision and standing by it. About having the freedom to choose. It's a thought that gives you freedom to just be. Not become equals or equally chutiyatic (wait that's vaginal') as another gender.

When you took your whole family and cook for the film, didn't you know it is going to end with a jauhar? Why act so surprised? Oh because you wanted him to include a comment on the practice? Ok then... as if the number of disclaimers were not enough. It's the story of womens' valour and their brave, harsh, radical decision. Their choice. That my dear is feminism. The power to be able to choose.

What perhaps was a victory for the filmmaker was the blinding of khilji as he entered the fort precincts, by burning embers thrown at him by the women. Such was the power of their fire within that they didn't let the enemy lay their hands upon themselves. Why make them small and guilty of an act that they chose to protect themselves in the face of lynching and a life of slavery? Why judge that day from 700 years ago with what would I do today'? It's a film based in the 13th century when women preferred and chose death to rape.

Then don't watch historicals, here or abroad. A gladiator' would perhaps shake your sensibilities of a slave in today's context! Or a Troy might again make you feel like some other body part... A squishy liver perhaps. Since we cant appreciate art, lets violate it. With karni sena on one side and the vaginas on the other. Lets demand jauhar from the makers and feel victorious with sensationalising it with our judgements and parameters.

It was Padmavati's choice and free will to not give herself up to Khilji. The question about life after rape does not arise. She, out of her free will, chose to embrace the fire rather than the tyrannical Alauddin. How is that any less empowering? It was a matter of choice and not forced upon them by their husbands! So, Padmavati was not a rape victim' who was so shamed that she didn't have a right to live, as you make it out to be in your letter. Amazing what you all make it into. Was your open letter about Padmaavat or the regressive Bhoomi'?

And factually speaking Sati' was a practice (forced tradition) where women self-immolate themselves (mostly by force, sometimes by will) after the husbands' death. Similar tradition called Saka' was observed by men who face a certain death in the battlefield. Jauhar' is only and only out of free will. As a woman. And as a vagina'.

So people who feel like a vagina' after watching Padmaavati, should continue to feel like a vagina' for they would never understand the power it has. The power to create and run the world. Such people are the biggest road-blocks for feminism'.

-RD- thumbnail
Hogwarts Championship 2025 Thumbnail Gulaal-e-Jung Thumbnail + 9
Posted: 7 years ago
#6
And I just thought hum log IF waale hi velle hai but then there is always someone better than u out there 🤣

Related Topics

Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: khan.baba · 3 months ago

https://www.facebook.com/arsalan.khan.729238/videos/3170732383104214

https://www.facebook.com/arsalan.khan.729238/videos/3170732383104214
Expand â–Ľ
Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".