After Sonu nigam now suchitra slams azaan.

First Previous

Page

Frequent Posters

awsome.moments

@awsome.moments

Navigator

Posted: 8 years ago

#41

SO weird our country is - that Akshay Kumar gets away almost unscathed for holding our tricolour upside down, Salman khan gets cheered for escaping a prison sentence, Sanjay Dutt merely gets a few years in jail and loads of sympathy for housing terrorist guns and here we are not allowing Sonu Nigam to breathe becoz of his single tweet which was within the limits of law and for which he has clarified and apologised. We keep bringing up his name even when he is already out of the media for good. Also please think for a second if this man really requires more fame than what he already has before reducing all his achievements down to trash. Just think how truly secular we are

Edited by shal1983 - 8 years ago

Quote

1101831

Suspended

Posted: 8 years ago

#42

Originally posted by: TheBoss

LMAO. This is actually true you know. There are many times where I have to fly right above my home to another city because the fare is cheaper. Sometimes it even has a stop over. Somehow the ticket is still cheaper with that stop over rather than just flying to my actual destination. If I only have a carry on I just disembark although they frown upon this but then there are other times I am flying above my city and feel like wished I could just get a parachute and land on home directly instead of driving back again 5-6 hours. 😆

yeah dropping passenger directly to their home will be good but only issue with someone like me is that i carry over weight carryon luggage without paying extra money, if they drop me with my luggage i might land faster then meteorites 😆

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

1101831

Suspended

Posted: 8 years ago

#43

Originally posted by: AnikaLoveshivay

Bingo!
People also wants to listen azaan voice so they lives near mosques n temple n build such religious structures.

Now just because one sect don't wanna to listen azaan or temple bells but other want to hear so you just can't ban them.

No Muslims lives near Ganga ghat that's why people don't complain .wht if Varanasi become Muslim majority so will you ban Ganga Aarti?

u r comparing apple with potato, adhan is calling people for prayer, while aarti is offering prayer to God, for aarti they don't call/remind people.

Quote

iambest

@iambest

Rocker

Posted: 8 years ago

#44

the thing is where people have issues with loudspeakers one can debate on it in a good way our people specially in sonu nigam case abused him so badly just for having an opinion .i am muslim from pakistan here we are in muslim majority and hardly there are any hindu follower living near my area so we have no issue with loudspeakers for azan its a technological advantage but i beleive when u are living in a place of diverse religion followers u need to have patience and try to understand things from their point of view and than come to solution...

[YOUTUBE]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OMxzA7wfy5A[/YOUTUBE]

he is one of the best islamic scholar from pakistan javid ahmed ghamdi sahab always make sensible points his point of view

Edited by iambest - 8 years ago

Quote

2filmy

@2filmy

Trailblazer

Posted: 8 years ago

#45

Loudspeakers for any religion can be done without
They cause so much inconvenience to people
God will hear your prayers if you pray from your heart
We really should not bash her for expressing a sane view