Originally posted by: Allyson
I habe to agree with your assessment. I would also have preferred if Kanak would have been under the drama misunderstanding. For me tjere is almost no redeeming Uma at this point.
Why was this gunshot wedding necessary? Why did the makers need to show it this way? And why did they try and draw a parallel between them and Suraj-Sandhya? Their situation was completely different.
I guess Uma's redemption will be the bring Kanak and Bhabho closer? But will that be redemption enough?
exactly...comparison ought to happen if they keep comparing suraj sandya with the current pair...
firstly im not too sure whats the background behind the forced marriage...fb comments lured me here...
suraj was a sacrificer, when he realises sandhya wasnt happy with marriage he tried to "release" her from their marriage by taking the blame though he loved her very much...here it's completely opposite...it's good to have a fresh lead with a fresh story but drawing a parallel is what not working...
being a huge fan of DABH 1 during it's initial stage i think the makers are not doing justice with this comparison...either you start with a "fresh" story with love-hate concept or if you would want to carry on with comparison, please do justice to the characters...btw dabh wasnt about love-hate...it was an unhappy marriage for sandhya but she respected suraj the way he is...
Edited by .NJ. - 8 years ago