Is it right to exploit people and destroy property for own problems? - Page 4

Originally posted by: angel_juhi04

He too called her a thief dat also even after giving back d phone which was not right. If she was really a thief she wud not have returned d phone. But she only raised her hand n then stopped realizing she is going too far. If she had slapped him then we wud have bashed her for dat.

But she also call him thief right? she saw him as rich man then also she thought as thief. but he did not react that time also. anybody can MU stranger like gauri did to om and om did to gauri. 😆and I am not saying gauri is wrong everyone has trigger point to loose his/her temper gauri loose it when he call her chor and harm her self respect and om loose it when she bring his parents in between. I am just trying to prove my point.😳

Originally posted by: akshi.

Point is you know om from beg but gauri doesn't know him na & u said gauri shouldn't have thrown dirt or question his upbringing then what she should do stand there & cry I guess we have plenty of heroine doing that. She just replied in same manner to om. But u know what after sometimes she won't do all this just stand & cry like other heroine & reason would b she fell for him.

& you said he did not react he literally ran his car over that stall I'd he was that old om he would have listened to her he was just being another sso.

Earlier om character was most loved my me but now I can't say such. Gul just ruined & made another sso

When did I say that She should stand there and cry I am happy that she gave back om in same manner😆( and this is my only wish that she should not change after some time.) I am saying if om is wrong than gauri is also not right.
He ran his car over that stall when she bring his parents in between who will not loose your cool when someone being your parents in between we all know that for him this is very sensitive matter as you say she don't know him from begging that doesn't gave her right to bring his parents in between their fight. I don't thing Old om also keep listening when anyone bring his family. and gauri also ran bulldozer over his car don't you feel that is wrong too.😆
I am saying he didn't react when she point out him or raise her hand to slap him but loose it when she bring his parents everyone has weak point she has her self respect when he call her thief she raise her hand. I am just saying here people are only seeing what omkara did. does not what gauri did just because Omkara is ML and most importantly gul's hero so he is wrong and gauri is ML and gul's heroin she is right👏 what a justice.

P.S. I am not liking this omkara as well. i want my omi back😭

I completely agree with you Uni. Om cannot be painted completely black nor can Gauri be painted completely white. Infact last day a friend who had watched an episode with me was amused at how Gauri raised hand at Omkara in a public place. He was saying how no one comments on things like this on twitter even though Gauri lacked the basic decency which Omkara exhibited when he was accused of being a thief. Just imagine a situation if Om had raised his hands at all lol. In my friend's words Omkara would have been torn apart by the fandom. It's simply unfair lol

Juhi, we are not saying that Om was justified in not giving a notice or was not wrong in throwing money, or on saying those lines. These were all very wrong and I hated that scene

But our point is only that people must not only blame the ML, but also the FL for similar mistake

If Om was wrong in notice giving a prior notice, Gauri was wrong in behaving as it was her right to have a shop in someone else's land

Just think of a scenario, you are travelling a long distance via train (say 24 hours journey) and you reach your birth and find someone occupying it, when you ask him to move, he simply says that he would move after 2 hours (and mind it with authority, not as a request), would you actually give him/her the birth?

Ok she got angry at him on his throwing the money but she gave back to him by throwing the dirt so what was the reason to bring the upbringing (you can not punish for the same crime twice), then Om bashed into his shop after Gauri smashed his car. So both had been equal till then.

If Om was wrong in throwing the money, Gauri was wrong in brining the issue of upbringing (at least after she had got back to him by throwing the dirt), rest of the things were just the reactions

Later at the time of mobile interaction, he called her thief, since he found his phone in Gauri's hand and not always you find people carrying a random phone they found on the road, the next day. Similarly she felt that he is an imposter when he said that he was Omkara, so over there again no one was at fault, but Gauri did raise hand which could be considered wrong (although yet justified since she was hurt hearing the word thief for her)

So till now both have been equally wrong and equally justified in few of their actions, so they must be equally blamed

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

Juhi, we are not saying that Om was justified in not giving a notice or was not wrong in throwing money, or on saying those lines. These were all very wrong and I hated that scene

But our point is only that people must not only blame the ML, but also the FL for similar mistake

If Om was wrong in notice giving a prior notice, Gauri was wrong in behaving as it was her right to have a shop in someone else's land

Just think of a scenario, you are travelling a long distance via train (say 24 hours journey) and you reach your birth and find someone occupying it, when you ask him to move, he simply says that he would move after 2 hours (and mind it with authority, not as a request), would you actually give him/her the birth?

Ok she got angry at him on his throwing the money but she gave back to him by throwing the dirt so what was the reason to bring the upbringing (you can not punish for the same crime twice), then Om bashed into his shop after Gauri smashed his car. So both had been equal till then.

If Om was wrong in throwing the money, Gauri was wrong in brining the issue of upbringing (at least after she had got back to him by throwing the dirt), rest of the things were just the reactions

Later at the time of mobile interaction, he called her thief, since he found his phone in Gauri's hand and not always you find people carrying a random phone they found on the road, the next day. Similarly she felt that he is an imposter when he said that he was Omkara, so over there again no one was at fault, but Gauri did raise hand which could be considered wrong (although yet justified since she was hurt hearing the word thief for her)

So till now both have been equally wrong and equally justified in few of their actions, so they must be equally blamed

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

The FL has not forgiven him, if he threw money, she threw dirt and challenged his upbringing, if he drove down her shop, then she was in his land and then smashed down his car

Yes he was wrong in not giving her time but then even she wasn't asking him a favor but was rather behaving like it was her right to have her shop over there

We cant just justify her wrong actions just because she was poor or was a girl

Originally posted by: onlyrani

I was referring to the common theme in serials, not her. MLs are mean and the FLs forgive that is the formula.

Not sure how pointing out that he didn't give her the 2 hours is justifying her actions because she is a girl or poor? I said he was in the right, but he ruined it by behaving like a brute. No where did I say her actions were right.