If we can digest the fact that Dev became one of the richest man in India in very shot span of time (evn less thn 7) without any external help, why is it difficult to accept Sonakshi's success in 7yrs. She atleast has her brother's exp of running online business and ger own exp in Nutrition field.. They have shown her's as app based company and we know how fast these companies grow n become profitable.
Getting the same award as Dev..Dev got it when he was 27 so had maybe 5-6yrs exp only...n as business woman Sona has 7yrs exp...but she had exp in Nutrition field for 3-4yrs before tht.
And her company is still less than Vicki's, whereas it seems like Dev is running multiple such companies.
Yes we see less flaws of Sonakshi compared to Dev and they have always shown the reason also for this...its Dev's childhood struggles n family members. The lessons he has learnt throughout his life by circumstances or by his mother, makes him react to situations differently and unpredictable which makes it interesting. His actions and reactions are always extreme...so when he does smthing wrong he is bashed a lot, but when he does something good..he gets much more appreciation n acknowledgement compared to Sonakshi.
Talking abt credit...first season we saw it was Dev's career highlighted...his business acumen, awards, generosity, helping others, his love n devotion for family. Why is it wrong to show career ascent of FL.Why only MLs have to be rich n famous n girl from middle class...another classic trait borrowed from Ekta n Co.
When it comes to showing pain, Dev gets much more screen time and importance.
Well fertility track was d worst track of the whole show..handled without any knowledge or sensitivity. Till now (3 epi) we hv seen Sona's side n as story builds up we see Dev as a father n again focus wud be on Dev's pain from being away from her daughter for 7yrs. Then offcourse Sona wud b shown as negative n Dev wud get all sympathies.