Ranveer Singh Fired From DON 3
TUM MERI HOO 24.12
SHAADI DONE 25.12
Mihir epic one liners
YRKKH 2025 Recap: The Year Logic Died!
Katrina looks ordinary infront of Kareena!!!
Akshaye Khanna walks out of Drishyam 3
Tulsi Mihir mulaqat
-Happy Birthday Adnan Khan- 🎉 😇
Zindagi Ke Rang ~ Rangad/Kabirima/Amritam FF
Originally posted by: Tanulovesrt
Helena is Chandra's wife. What's the problem if he come close to her??
ohk ..par isse to bas yahi pata chalta hai ki helena nandini ke sath giri hui harkat karti hai ...par vo chandra ke close jaye ...aur intimate bhi ho jaye to problem kya hai logo ko ...hai to uski wife hi ...cvs to hamesha ese show karte hai ki unke beech kabhi intimacy honi hi nhi chahiye...agar ho gayi to ye message jaega ki "evil won over goodness"...isnt it stupid ? ...helena koi rape thodi na kar rhi hai ..chandra fully agree karta hai...Originally posted by: shailusri1983
I will answer this question. There is actually nothing wrong in it if both Chandra and Helena want it to happen. But Helena is engaging in extended strategms and plots just to create MUs between Chandra and Nandini, keep them apart, infuriate and instigate one against the other, show one co-wife apparent false love scratches on her hand to mislead and disgust her against her own husband, engage in very cheap and crass talking, somehow scheme and manipulate your co-wife to make a Mukut for her former Mangetar just to spite off her husband, write false love letters on behalf of her co-wife to her former fianc and let it fall into her husband's hands, and when the poor chap, her husband, is mad with anger and jealousy, to catch him on the rebound and have a physical relationship with him. The chap does not want to do the deed with her at all, and this lady is trying all her means to besmirch her co-wife's honor and get her husband to bed her under this mistaken impression. How cheap does all this look and sound?
Originally posted by: shailusri1983
I will answer this question. There is actually nothing wrong in it if both Chandra and Helena want it to happen. But Helena is engaging in extended strategms and plots just to create MUs between Chandra and Nandini, keep them apart, infuriate and instigate one against the other, show one co-wife apparent false love scratches on her hand to mislead and disgust her against her own husband, engage in very cheap and crass talking, somehow scheme and manipulate your co-wife to make a Mukut for her former Mangetar just to spite off her husband, write false love letters on behalf of her co-wife to her former fianc and let it fall into her husband's hands, and when the poor chap, her husband, is mad with anger and jealousy, to catch him on the rebound and have a physical relationship with him. The chap does not want to do the deed with her at all, and this lady is trying all her means to besmirch her co-wife's honor and get her husband to bed her under this mistaken impression. How cheap does all this look and sound?
Originally posted by: shailusri1983
I will answer this question. There is actually nothing wrong in it if both Chandra and Helena want it to happen. But Helena is engaging in extended strategms and plots just to create MUs between Chandra and Nandini, keep them apart, infuriate and instigate one against the other, show one co-wife apparent false love scratches on her hand to mislead and disgust her against her own husband, engage in very cheap and crass talking, somehow scheme and manipulate your co-wife to make a Mukut for her former Mangetar just to spite off her husband, write false love letters on behalf of her co-wife to her former fianc and let it fall into her husband's hands, and when the poor chap, her husband, is mad with anger and jealousy, to catch him on the rebound and have a physical relationship with him. The chap does not want to do the deed with her at all, and this lady is trying all her means to besmirch her co-wife's honor and get her husband to bed her under this mistaken impression. How cheap does all this look and sound?