Ramakant left Aditi nothing LoL

First Previous

Page

Frequent Posters

Libra123

@Libra123

Inactive

Posted: 9 years ago

#11

Originally posted by: RayofHope_
The person who has the property can give it to even ghar ka naukar and law would not object that Ramakant could divide his property equally between three children but that swine named most for Atharva , and gave his sins to Ravish to rectify and gave nothing to aditi
Ravish is only a tool for Ramakant to correct his misdeeds He used Ravish's goodness Aditi does not even exist for him

Yes, u r right person who has the property can do whatever he wants with it only if it's hard earned monenot inheritance..in this case RK got it thru inheritance.. but again, I am not sure..

But in the show its shown that way to make certain chars mahaan and promote some actors.. That's it

Quote

ViTharvforever

@ViTharvforever

Sparkler

Posted: 9 years ago

#12

this is called woman empowerment...daughters dont have right in property..😆tleast they shud have shown kalindi or suman voicing it ..but no n suman she is always behind ravish...my beta my bahu...bt beti??she has faced a heartbreak from avinash bt she doesnt care bt she cares for ravish's heartbreak only...poor aditi

i thought this post is voicing daughters rights..but no...its again for blaming atharv...

so rk not giving aditi a share is to glorify atharv...dadaji not giving share to kalindi is to glorify who????

Edited by ViTharvforever - 9 years ago

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Komal

@teribts7

Rocker

Posted: 9 years ago

#13

I thought Aditi was suman's sisters daughter lol. In reality who even gives property to their daughters especially in India where all they think about is the heirs (boys). Pretty sad reality when woman rule the world!!!

Quote

KK84

@KK84

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 9 years ago

#14

I actually don't think it's an intentional thing done by the CVs! Bhool Gaye to add Aditi! Chill out guys! Her role was so small that it's hard to even remember that she existed lol!

Quote

ViTharvforever

@ViTharvforever

Sparkler

Posted: 9 years ago

#15

Originally posted by: _KOMAL
I thought Aditi was suman's sisters daughter lol. In reality who even gives property to their daughters especially in India where all they think about is the heirs (boys). Pretty sad reality when woman rule the world!!!

i live in india where daughters r given equal rights in property...if not given they can go to court at anytym

Quote

Komal

@teribts7

Rocker

Posted: 9 years ago

#16

Originally posted by: ViTharvforever

i live in india where daughters r given equal rights in property...if not given they can go to court at anytym

Oh really?? I heard in rural parts of India they get nothing 😕 my bad!!! Usually, when you live overseas you see articles on how daughters/woman are treated badly and are never given property rights.

Quote

Potterhead

@potterhead14

Dazzler

+ 2

Posted: 9 years ago

#17

this was so pathetic
its like aditi didn even exist for ramakant
and the worst part is when the lawyer said that the house is left dadaji said it will be either for ravis or suman i mean even he didnt consider the house to be on aditis name. IT wont be suurprising if after a while her character just vanishes in thin air

Quote

1 2

Ramakant left Aditi nothing LoL - Page 2

Related Topics

Explore Topics