MAIRAs BIRTHDAY 13.1
CELEBRATION🎉 12.1.26
Viral tweet on Priyanka and Nick
🏏WPL 2026: Match 6: MIW vs GGW at Navi Mumbai on 13/01/26🏏
🏏WPL 2026: Match 5: UPW vs RCBW at Navi Mumbai on 12/01/26🏏
Official Trailer - Mardaani 3 - Rani Mukherjee
Baapji's grand daughter... a new potential bahu?
Anupamaa 12 Jan 2026 Written Update & Daily Discussions Thread
Maira Vani storyline
New promo : AI bulldozer
17 years of Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai
Tulsi SN Business bacha payegi??
Toxic song - Chand se pucha
Happy Birthday Sultan Mirza 🧁
Ya this can be a valid reason. If dis is the reason we all r with herOriginally posted by: WeRockTheWorld
If your Bhabhi is continuing to breast feed the child it will be difficult for her. Most of them stop breast feeding only after a year or so. And again you cant force a lady to work especially when her baby is not even 1 yr old. That is why most organisations have LOA /Sabbatical etc. Here they can take leave with out pay for longer duration and join back . Or you bhabhi will have to work at organisations which allow work flexible option for women.Most of the IT org these days allow such options so that women can balance home and office. So it might be like workin for 2 days a week or half days...or even WFH ( Work from home ) options.This is if she wants to continue as a professional . If she thinks that she doesnt want to work as she wants to concentrate in bringing up her child no one can say anything.
Originally posted by: WeRockTheWorld
Neha's case is different. She is not an earning member. It is only RV that earns. Here the lady in question is earning. Money has the power to destroy a relationship. And a woman especially when she becomes a mother she will only see her child and her childs future first. That is how she is designed . That is how the nature made her.
Originally posted by: fangirl-rt
There was post titled "contract" by tia
On similar lines, in business, when mergers or takeover happens, thorough audit is done...Because no one wants to get into debt...If she was married without informing her about the debt, it is breach of trust...Business would invalidate the deal citing non transperancy and fraud...Bottomline, if it was hidden at the time of marriage, the intentions were ill and evil... and most probably the baby was brought to seal the deal as without the bond of baby, she would have had an easy exit route...