Don't you think this is a very illogical statement?
Based on the finger prints report, Ragini claims that Babli is not Tripti. Before that she was considering the possibility that Babli is Tripti. If Babli is Tripti, then the person whose post mortem was done cannot be Tripti. Then what is the point in matching Babli's finger prints with that dead body's finger prints?
I am not saying that Babli must be Tripti. May be she is. May be she is not. But what I am saying is that if Ragini needs to verify if Babli is Tripti, then she should not consider the finger prints of a dead person as Tripti's finger prints.
Was she considering the possibility that Tripti died, again became alive and became Babli?😉