varunike thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 30 Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 9 years ago
#1
i understand ruhi is angry but she is still under 18.. She cannot decide whom to stay with.. she cant say her family is dysfunctional. there are pihu and adi who can testify.. anyways that is not needed.
how can nidhi claim custody. all of them know that they was a case against her. she kiidnapped a kid . she acted dead and escaped with ruhi. she was a gambler who owed money in australia.. i mean cvs kuch logic nahi soch sakthe fine but itna bakwaas bhi nahi sochna chahiye.

they have made a mockery about relations, marriage , law etc etc...


Created

Last reply

Replies

2

Views

587

Users

3

Likes

3

Frequent Posters

TheM5393 thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Fascinator 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#2
Actually civil and criminal cases are heard in different courts... so this is possible.
sunitas123 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#3
Plus Raman's lawyers have never won anything till now ...except initial Ruhi custody!

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".