" Shama hi satya hai
shama hi daya hai
shama hi dharam hai
shama hi tapasya hai
Shama hi ek matra satya hai"
Page
of
1KRISH THROWN 28.12
BUY FIRM BACK 29.12
Let's make if official
No wonder Sunny Deol was jealous from SRK!!!
Tara Veer are now being compared with the OG Deepika Ranveer ☠️
🏏India Women vs Sri Lanka Women, 4th T20I Thiruvananthapuram🏏
Ranbir Kapoor Fresh Look
Love And War Budget Shoots up ,now eyeing Aug/Sep release
Hrithik Roshan is the most beautiful man to ever exist
📚Book Talk January Reading Challenge: Let us Read, Review & Revel📚
Originally posted by: islandboy401
well.........in some ways they did agree.......but not in all ways........
Yes.....both wanted to establish righteousness in the world..
However, they were different...
Yuddhistir was a good warrior, but most of his fame was due to the strength of his brothers.....his brothers basically won battles for him........while PRC won his battles himself...
Also, Yuddhistir was more of a morale thinker.......cuz he was son of Dharamraj, so naturally, he would be a very morale person.........He wasn't affected by womanly pleasures so much that it came between his goals.....
PRC on the other hand, did let womanly pleasures come in the way........and this became his weakness....
Yuddhistir was more of the type of person who accepted what was given to him........and believed that whatever's happening.......its god's way......he accepted to stay in the forest for 12 years........just cuz Dhitrasta ordered him too........while he could've started a war right then and thre.....
PRC was the type of person who challenged what was happening.......and usually tried to make things his way......
He wouldn't stand for humiliation.....if he was in Yuddhistir's situation.......he wouldn't have been that patient........he would've started war right when Duryodhan and them attempted to take his kingdom.......
He always made sure things turned out his way, compared to Yuddhistir, who was sort of an acceptor...
I'm not saying one quality is better than another.......
This is just how they were...
Originally posted by: islandboy401
well.........in some ways they did agree.......but not in all ways........
Yes.....both wanted to establish righteousness in the world..
However, they were different...
Yuddhistir was a good warrior, but most of his fame was due to the strength of his brothers.....his brothers basically won battles for him........while PRC won his battles himself...
Also, Yuddhistir was more of a morale thinker.......cuz he was son of Dharamraj, so naturally, he would be a very morale person.........He wasn't affected by womanly pleasures so much that it came between his goals.....
PRC on the other hand, did let womanly pleasures come in the way........and this became his weakness....
Yuddhistir was more of the type of person who accepted what was given to him........and believed that whatever's happening.......its god's way......he accepted to stay in the forest for 12 years........just cuz Dhitrasta ordered him too........while he could've started a war right then and thre.....
PRC was the type of person who challenged what was happening.......and usually tried to make things his way......
He wouldn't stand for humiliation.....if he was in Yuddhistir's situation.......he wouldn't have been that patient........he would've started war right when Duryodhan and them attempted to take his kingdom.......
He always made sure things turned out his way, compared to Yuddhistir, who was sort of an acceptor...
I'm not saying one quality is better than another.......
This is just how they were...
yaa!! u r right!! thanx for share😊
yeh thx tht was nicly said!