Do you believe in Aryan invasion theory ? - Page 2

First of all there is no evidence of massacre. All that theory implies is Aryans took away the land by force.. now it could be as simple as telling the dravidians - yaha se kat le.. or create a ruckus😆.. Remember dravidians didnt have by and large presence of warriors in the real sense so kat lene main hee samajhdari hone ki sambhavna hai 😆 (remember the pandits from jammu when karshmir terrorism started) Think of all those 6'5" weel built aggressive aryans., just telling to leave would be enough...😆.. ok didnt mean to make fun of this theory... unless you know of some kind of evidence of massacre.. this shouldnt be assumed...Britishers couldnt be visting india for 200 years!!!.. they are settled generations of who you said form the anglo -indians, although this term still doesnt indicate mixed ancestry.. they could be just english people living in india...

Aur blond hair and blue eyes ke genes ka evidence nahi hai toh phir any argument will work... at least a few mixed ancestry should bear that trait.. i think.

all said - the theory these guys have come with - lets wait and watch, which academic professionals accept that theory.. i am kind of sceptical of this research.. irrespective of how many man years and $$$$$$ they might have spent on this...