The biggest sin is not to help someone when you have the power - Ram

First Previous

Page

Frequent Posters

Ramyalaxmi

@Ramyalaxmi

Dazzler

Posted: 9 years ago

#11

@Shruthi: Beautifully described the moral in words. 👏 When someone really trust you as a saviour having the ability to save, the believer should not be turned down. There is a beautiful thirukural which states that
"When those you find from whom 'tis meet to ask,- for aid apply;
Theirs is the sin, not yours, if they the gift deny. "

If you meet with those that may be begged of, you may beg; (but) if they withhold (their gift) it is their blame and not yours.

Yes, Ahalya waited for only that pure soul raghuvanshi and not for any form of god. Ram asked "I don't know whether I am the one but if I refuse to go and turned out to be the one she waited". A soul touching dialogue.

Help the needy as long as we can. For the person who got the help, the saviour is simply the god irrespective of who is he/she. So don't wait for the god to come and act as long as we can behaviour in the same fashion. Again its the words of Ram to Jabali. He preached what he practised that is what differentiates Ram from most of us.

Quote

maya_sm

@maya_sm

Navigator

Posted: 9 years ago

#12

Yesterday Ram's scene with Ahilya was sup[erb. The Way he explained Ppl we should not judge anyone wrong or right.

He freed Ahilya from the curse and Vishnu Asked Sorry from the behalf of the Samaj to Ahilya.

Rama could free Ahilya from the curse given by the society and her husband for the mistake she never commited.

But why he could not free Sita from the false allegations against her even later on after knowing Luv Kush are his sons?

He could have Punished the Praja or the ppl who doubted Sita after she went to Mother Earth.

I am not at all blaming Rama for Sita's sufferings.

Sita also suffered same fate as Ahilya but suffered more even the unborn sons of Rama suffered due to Ayodhya's Praja's repeated mistake of doubting Sita.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Kavila

@Kavila

Sparkler

+ 2

Posted: 9 years ago

#13

Originally posted by: mmurdeshwar
Yesterday Ram's scene with Ahilya was sup[erb. The Way he explained Ppl we should not judge anyone wrong or right.

He freed Ahilya from the curse and Vishnu Asked Sorry from the behalf of the Samaj to Ahilya.

Rama could free Ahilya from the curse given by the society and her husband for the mistake she never commited.

But why he could not free Sita from the false allegations against her even later on after knowing Luv Kush are his sons?

He could have Punished the Praja or the ppl who doubted Sita after she went to Mother Earth.

I am not at all blaming Rama for Sita's sufferings.

Sita also suffered same fate as Ahilya but suffered more even the unborn sons of Rama suffered due to Ayodhya's Praja's repeated mistake of doubting Sita.

this is where we get confuse it was Sita who decided to take samadhi ..as she was Bhumija.. the daughter of Earth so who is bhumija ...had to scumb under the bhumi itself..

the alligation was all the way to make path for sitas...return to her orginal home ''earth..'''

ram has seroiusly nothing to do in such case...we have always seen ramayana from ram or ravaan perspective but we have never seen it from Sitas POV..

SKR is all about...SITAS pov...

and we have false alligation how Rama can oder to sita to give agnipariksha after return from lanka..

But it was Sita himself who decided to prove by giving the test Ram even tld her that she did not and even request her hard but ...to keep honour of her husband she decided to give it..

Ram never ever said anything to sita...about her character...it was all destined...

Quote

shruthiravi

@shruthiravi

Stunner

+ 2

Posted: 9 years ago

#14

@antika I remember u. Is it eht or Everest forum we met. And coming to sita banishment let us see how it is presented before commenting. Let us not judge prematurely. Everyone busy today. Will post today epi analysis tomorrow or Monday

Quote

Kavila

@Kavila

Sparkler

+ 2

Posted: 9 years ago

#15

Originally posted by: shruthiravi
@antika I remember u. Is it eht or Everest forum we met. And coming to sita banishment let us see how it is presented before commenting. Let us not judge prematurely. Everyone busy today. Will post today epi analysis tomorrow or Monday

yup shruti and yes its not to jude earlier i am tellling the fact because...sita aka maady herself has told in every interview that this is sitas pov...and people has false info that ram asked sita to give agnipariksha ..but in reality it was sita herself who decided to do so...and many more this kind of thin we gona see in the show and even i have also read many boooks ...which states sita herselftook decision to give test to prove her chastitiy..

hope fpr the best letts se how they potrays it...and i am very excited for swamvaar anf moreover Raavanas entry with the entry of Raavan the actual epic RAMAYANAA starts so...😃

Quote

maya_sm

@maya_sm

Navigator

Posted: 9 years ago

#16

I AM SORRY IF I HAVE HURT ANYONE. MY INTENTION IS NOT TO HURT ANYONE. I HAVE NOT BLAMED RAMA AND WONT EVER BLAME RAMA FOR SITA'S FATE.

I M NOT ALSO BEING JUDGEMENTAL.

I WROTE THIS BECAUSE I HAVE READ MANY STORIES AND MOVIES SHOWING RAMA ASKING SITA TO GIVE AGNIPARIKSHA.

Quote

shruthiravi

@shruthiravi

Stunner

+ 2

Posted: 9 years ago

#17

@murudeshwar no one is blaming you and you have not hurt atleast me. What I just said is that let us see how the show portrays these two high controversial incidents which in contrast with Ram's general disposition. Because I as a person always wanted to answers to those because whatever justification available was not satisfactory to me.

This show so far has given something rational, so I am willing to wait till they air agnipareeksha and banishment.