They really change her personality as they change her looks..was the transformation from the 'good' ragini to 'bad' ragini shown properly,built up properly? i wonder how somebody who could not stand up for herself became this egoistic maalkin who would mouth dialogues like 'these people would pay for insulting me'..she even threw things in anger when laksh insulted her..don't get me wrong,the egoistic ragini is what i found interesting in the first place..but like i said i am wondering if the transformation was proper.
anyway like i said it would have been interesting if the positive ragini retained certain qualities of being manipulative,cunning etc etc..also the ability to answer back to jobless aunties..but she lost this too.
they aren't interested in her character in the first place..forget about retaining anything or making her a realistic character..she is back to being the way she was and the actress is also happy..only being 'positive' is on the mind..i get not wishing to play negative characters,specially on indian tv where if you play negative lead for long then u are stuck with that image..but does being a strong and/or interesting character not matter at all?