Rishi Kapoor: I am Alia Bhatt Of 70's

Meeti-Mirchi

@Meeti-Mirchi

Voyager

Posted: 10 years ago

Guess to whom did veteran actor Rishi Kapoor resemble in his 1970's? It's none other than beautiful damsel Alia Bhatt. His fan and cricketer Arun Lal shared Rishi's 1970's picture with caption "Alia Bhatt in 1970."

The post brought smiles on his fans' faces and he proved that he is a man with great sense of humour.

Rishi, who had his first lead role opposite actress Dimple Kapadia in the 1973 film 'Bobby,' was recently honoured with 2016 Screen Lifetime Achievement Award.

Quote

Frequent Posters

904910

Suspended

Posted: 10 years ago

😆

Yaah here he looks like Alia

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

566912

Hibernated

Posted: 10 years ago

OMG. Yes, He does look like aloo. That baby face 😆😆

Quote

Hydro123

@Hydro123

Dazzler

Posted: 10 years ago

Aaj fir chadha li chintu ji ne.

Edited by Hydro123 - 10 years ago

Quote

222149

Hibernated

Posted: 10 years ago

Did rishi kapoor say this or his friend arun lal?anyway both are happy I guess😆

Quote

744066

Hibernated

Posted: 10 years ago

He is quite funny. I like his sense of humours . quite alive personality

Quote

Guzara Waqt

@Mango_Melody

Stunner

+ 3

Posted: 10 years ago

He is entertainment, entertainment n entertainment. 😆

Quote

.Achillies.

@.Achillies.

Navigator

Posted: 10 years ago

Rishi behaves like rich spoilt brat always, in his mind he is still a teenager.

Quote

IAmLuvBolly

@IAmLuvBolly

Sparkler

+ 8

Posted: 10 years ago

Now that he brought it up, yea he does 😆

Quote

ponymo

@ponymo

Sparkler

+ 4

Posted: 10 years ago

#10

Originally posted by: misterbates
ranbir should take tips from his daddy on how to be alive and have a personality instead of snorting all the time and looking so dead

Does having a personality always mean expressing everything just because you can?

What about those who would prefer having a private life?

They are entertainers onscreen, but offscreen they are not obligated to entertain you.

Where does this logic come from?