[quote]
Originally posted by: Swatsu
Nice analysis Shruthi.This take on the Ramayana is so different from the ones we are familiar with.Actually each characters strength and weakness has been defined so well that you only end up sympathising.
In today's episode Chanrabaghu was only protecting the interest of her daughters just as Keikeyi was protecting the interest of Bharat.These insecure feelings are so relatable that we can easily understand the characters.Afterall we hardly see any Ram or Sita in our midst anymore.
I always thought that Ramayan was too perfect to be related to our times whereas the Mahabharata was more in tune with the present. I must confess it is refreshing to see this take on the most loved epic and all the actors are bang on with their acting.
Well I am certainly looking forward to more healthy discussions on this forum.
[/quote]
Thank you Swatsu for this well written post! @bold : my thoughts exactly!
The earlier portrayals of Ramayana presented an ideal world, whereas human issues are as old as the history of man, I think.
And they have only become more complex as the society has evolved. But the solutions still remain just as simple ! And this is what Ramayana in this version is highlighting
As for kekeyi, Chandrabhaga - being in the wrong, I can blame them only to a certain extent.
People like Rama are rare, infact so rare that we revere them and worship them. The beauty of Rama is that he never looks at any problem from how it will harm him, or help him, but always from the greater good!
And because His eyes are always fixed on the greater good of all, He is able to see clear direction and simple solutions, and remain emotionally balanced. ( Ashish is doing a great job, he always portrays inner peace and happiness )
It is this quality of his that will enable Him to take all the difficult decisions later too, as he will keep his own hardships out of the picture and look at the problems dispassionately, his focus will be on upholding values and principles and not self gratification.
But that's what makes Him the God. Let's not blame the others, human beings are imperfect and very often victims of the same social framework which also gives us protection.
Dashratha as a King - the whole future of his family, and even his kingdom rests on him having sons who will carry forward his legacy. He has been born and brought up in a society which believes that a King must have male heirs. He also genuinely believes that he has not broken his promise to kekeyis father, for she did not give him a son. When he had to do the putreshti yagya to get sons, it was through divine intervention and he got sons from all his queens.
Implicit in the promise was the assumtion that Kaushalya and Sumitra were not able to provide any male heirs, and would remain childless. Because he did not state that, to his mind, the promise became null and void, but to kekeyi it became a breach of trust.
A wronged kekeyi is more seeking justice for her broken faith, and hurt pride, than really conspiring against Rama ! Had she got an apology, or some sort of closure, she would've been soothed.
Chandrabhaga is facing a similar insecurity about her daughters. Society looks at things like lineage and unmarried daughters are a taboo, and probably it was more so then. Kushadhwaj like Dashratha shows no empathy for Chandrabhaga thus making her even more upset.
This is where Janak is different, he has a high level of empathy and so will look at things dispassionately and from her POV. This will lead to calming her and look at things from a positive aspect.
All I am trying to say is, they are just being human. Our relations and our emotions - the two things that protect us, also hurt us most
and issi duvidha ka naam hi toh jeevan hai, aur Issi se ooper uthne ka marg hi toh dikhate hain Rama humain.
Edited by Arshics - 10 years ago