Paraye Dekhe gun, apne dekhe kami- Sita

shruthiravi thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 10 years ago
#1
Today once again busted the myth of relations vs strangers. Look at the old peasant woman to whom Sita posed the question who were her parents, who left her. The lady tells her to them she is the Goddess. Because she is the one who has nurtured them. Because of her rains came. Because the rains came their lives prospered. Whatever they are now it is because of her. Maithili is the truth of Mithila. She is their Janaki. Their loving daughter. The peasant woman doesnt forget how the 12 year of drought felt like. She doesnt forget how the arrival of the baby girl changed the landscape of Mithila. From a land struggling for food, they prospered to have enough food, clothing and shelter. All because of a baby girl. In the baby girl the peasant lady saw their benefactor.
And Sita's chachi the great Chandrabagha how easily she forgot her joy of motherhood came because of that baby girl. Today that girl looks an impediment to her because as she is not a royal born, but born from earth she thinks her marriage is impossible. So if she doesnt get married what about her daughters. The daughters who wouldnt have even existed without the baby girl. But Chandrabagha forgot everything. She gave pain to the very man who gave her the pleasure of being a queen.

Chandrabagha is the classic example of people around us who are never satisfied. Who always want to point fingers, crib and never think how the others feel. She is the representative of that world who forgots the way they came. Currently only their present matters to them. Doesnt matter what they say, who they hurt. And the problem with such people is that , dealing with them is difficult because they are called relatives. If it is an outsider you can rebuke them, but how do you deal with a cribbing , complaining, fault finding family member. In their quest for selfishness more often than not women like Chandrabagha ends up destroying relations.


Edited by shruthiravi - 9 years ago

Created

Last reply

Replies

23

Views

2.5k

Users

11

Likes

121

Frequent Posters

b2011 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 10 years ago
#2
Well said Shruthi. Yours and Arshics posts are very meaningful and thought provoking. Glad this show makes us to realize many things.
shruthiravi thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 10 years ago
#3
@b2011 akka so happy to see you here. I actually miss all of you guys from DABH forum. We had such a gala time there for close to 2 years.
Edited by shruthiravi - 10 years ago
Swatsu thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#4
Nice analysis Shruthi.This take on the Ramayana is so different from the ones we are familiar with.Actually each characters strength and weakness has been defined so well that you only end up sympathising.
In today's episode Chanrabaghu was only protecting the interest of her daughters just as Keikeyi was protecting the interest of Bharat.These insecure feelings are so relatable that we can easily understand the characters.Afterall we hardly see any Ram or Sita in our midst anymore.
I always thought that Ramayan was too perfect to be related to our times whereas the Mahabharata was more in tune with the present. I must confess it is refreshing to see this take on the most loved epic and all the actors are bang on with their acting.
Well I am certainly looking forward to more healthy discussions on this forum.
prav2 thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#5
Another wonderful take shruti..👏

When a relationship forget its root ,they become stranger
(like chanrabaghu today became to the family)

And when a stranger can connect with you ,they become relation
(like the farmers who felt a connect ..)

And you brought out that contrast very well... True relations need not be blood but actions connect us all through...

On another note,Both kaikeyis and chanrabaghu's problem start with the thought of thinking mine, my need etc...

Even if dasaratha has promised and when her brother said this to kaikeyi,
She could have said "all are our ons ,so where come the difference..."
There would have been no pain at all ...same with chanrabaghu... .this is the truth felt by the brothers,at no point of time they think my or mine and stand as a strength for each other. same is the case with the sisters too...

Our bakti margas lead us to the same path ,by surrendering us completely to the god we get a way to get rid of these thoughts of my ,mine which causes profound pain to us and our loved ones...
Edited by prav2 - 10 years ago
Arijit007 thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#6
jo tumhare man ko dukhaaye, kya woh apne hote hain bhi?
LekhaP thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#7
Nice analysis daily reading ur posts very nice and useful.
Arshics thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 10 years ago
#8
[quote]

Originally posted by: Swatsu

Nice analysis Shruthi.This take on the Ramayana is so different from the ones we are familiar with.Actually each characters strength and weakness has been defined so well that you only end up sympathising.

In today's episode Chanrabaghu was only protecting the interest of her daughters just as Keikeyi was protecting the interest of Bharat.These insecure feelings are so relatable that we can easily understand the characters.Afterall we hardly see any Ram or Sita in our midst anymore.
I always thought that Ramayan was too perfect to be related to our times whereas the Mahabharata was more in tune with the present. I must confess it is refreshing to see this take on the most loved epic and all the actors are bang on with their acting.
Well I am certainly looking forward to more healthy discussions on this forum.

[/quote]

Thank you Swatsu for this well written post! @bold : my thoughts exactly!

The earlier portrayals of Ramayana presented an ideal world, whereas human issues are as old as the history of man, I think.

And they have only become more complex as the society has evolved. But the solutions still remain just as simple ! And this is what Ramayana in this version is highlighting

As for kekeyi, Chandrabhaga - being in the wrong, I can blame them only to a certain extent.

People like Rama are rare, infact so rare that we revere them and worship them. The beauty of Rama is that he never looks at any problem from how it will harm him, or help him, but always from the greater good!

And because His eyes are always fixed on the greater good of all, He is able to see clear direction and simple solutions, and remain emotionally balanced. ( Ashish is doing a great job, he always portrays inner peace and happiness )

It is this quality of his that will enable Him to take all the difficult decisions later too, as he will keep his own hardships out of the picture and look at the problems dispassionately, his focus will be on upholding values and principles and not self gratification.

But that's what makes Him the God. Let's not blame the others, human beings are imperfect and very often victims of the same social framework which also gives us protection.

Dashratha as a King - the whole future of his family, and even his kingdom rests on him having sons who will carry forward his legacy. He has been born and brought up in a society which believes that a King must have male heirs. He also genuinely believes that he has not broken his promise to kekeyis father, for she did not give him a son. When he had to do the putreshti yagya to get sons, it was through divine intervention and he got sons from all his queens.

Implicit in the promise was the assumtion that Kaushalya and Sumitra were not able to provide any male heirs, and would remain childless. Because he did not state that, to his mind, the promise became null and void, but to kekeyi it became a breach of trust.

A wronged kekeyi is more seeking justice for her broken faith, and hurt pride, than really conspiring against Rama ! Had she got an apology, or some sort of closure, she would've been soothed.

Chandrabhaga is facing a similar insecurity about her daughters. Society looks at things like lineage and unmarried daughters are a taboo, and probably it was more so then. Kushadhwaj like Dashratha shows no empathy for Chandrabhaga thus making her even more upset.

This is where Janak is different, he has a high level of empathy and so will look at things dispassionately and from her POV. This will lead to calming her and look at things from a positive aspect.

All I am trying to say is, they are just being human. Our relations and our emotions - the two things that protect us, also hurt us most

and issi duvidha ka naam hi toh jeevan hai, aur Issi se ooper uthne ka marg hi toh dikhate hain Rama humain.

Edited by Arshics - 10 years ago
Ramyalaxmi thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#9
@Shruthi: Chandrabagha totally forgot how she became mother of two daughters and the queen. Yes, she merely behaved as a self-centered human being. I feel a mother can be like that thinking about only her children but can a queen? Didn't she be first queen than a mother? When we compare suniana and Chandrabagha the major difference is their understanding with their partners.

I cant stop from thinking about the greatness of Bharath who tackled his mother, uncle and mother-in-law. In a way, bharath was a strong-headed man. Though I am not aware of Bharath-Mandavi story, the show points out how all the 4 pairs are matched in their own way, true soulmates. Waiting for the other 2 pairs matching aspects.
shruthiravi thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 10 years ago
#10
Thank you guys. Very nice discussion points. I will add couple of points
@swastu you bought out my thought too. I too have considered Ramayana ideal and not in tune with present times. I have also felt I can relate more to Krishna's ways than Rama's. But this show is telling me I was wrong. Relationship dynamics existed in similar ways during tetra yug also. There were complexities then also. And seeing Ram solving issues compassionately you are understanding the essence of Maryada Purushottam slowly but surely which was mostly trapped under the illusion of Sita's Agnipareeksha and Sita's banishment. I am willing to look at these incidents with a more logical view point than an emotional view point or feminist view point.
@Arshics very valid points. Yes it is a fact that me, mine are part and parcel of human life. Kaikeyi wouldn't have been like this if Dasrath had understood her. If he had simply stated in a calm manner that yes he had given vachan, but isn't Ram her son too, doesn't she see the qualities of a king in Ram and left the decision to her she would have more or less pacified as Kaikeyi does love Ram. The fact Dasrath decided he has the power to take decision and no one can challenge him created the problems.
Similarly Kushadwaj should have understood Chandrabagha and should have discussed with his brother in private on the marriage of Sita and Urmila, should have casually asked about his plans. Maybe such harsh words for Sita could have been avoided. Yes human relations are being explored. And we can connect to them.
@Ramya Chandrabagha doesn't know when to be a Queen, when to be a wife, mother which Sunaina knows. And that understanding when to don your professional role, when your personal role is the key in balancing things out.
@Arjith dukh to apne hi dethe hain. poori duniya ko jeethnewale apno ke saamne haar jaathe hain. Did you watch Bajirao mastani. I wouldn't call it a great movie or something, but one thing I have to give to Sanjay Leela Bhansali. For showing a man who has won every battle in his life, fails the battle of his life in front of his adamant mother. The one who is fine to give mastani a status of her son's keep but not the status of his second wife. People forget by hurting their apne, they are hurting themselves. And when the reality strikes it is far too late in the game.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".