Did faulty procedures lead to Salman's acquittal?

Page

Suspended

Posted: 9 years ago

Judiciary gives verdict on evidences but kuch logo ne sab gud gober kar diya

MUMBAI: After the trial court held Salman Khan guilty in the 2002 hit-and-run case, the Bombay High Court today gave its verdict in favour of Salman where it claimed that the prosecution's case was weak. According to the High Court, many setbacks can be seen in Salman Khan's 2002 hit-and-run case.

The Bombay High Court is not convinced with the proofs put forward by the prosecution. The court has stated that there is no definite proof that Salman was driving when the accident took place.

Also, there is no evidence which proves that the accident took place due to tyre burst.

The key witness in the incident, Ravindra Patil, the then bodyguard of Salman, was declared as an "unreliable witness" by the court and the repetitive changes in his statements were tagged inconsistent.

Virtually dismissing the prosecution's case, Justice Joshi said the "prosecution failed to establish the charges (against Khan) on all counts" and that "it had failed to prove that Salman was drunk or driving" at the time of the accident, which left one pavement dweller dead and four others injured.

Also, Justice Joshi, the judge in this case said that the summoning of Kamal Khan and recording his statement was not needed. However, it is known that Kamal Khan was present with Salman the entire evening of September 28, 2002 as well as during the accident.

Salman's lawyer also claimed that the death of one of the victims named Narula did not happen due to Salman's car crushing him but resulted because of the crane which was called to lift the car after the accident. The vehicle slipped off the hook of the crane and fell on Narula crushing his abdomen and spinal cord.

Another reason that the Court gave the decision in Salman's favour was because of the inability of the prosecution to substantiate their case with proper evidences.

However, some of the lawyers say that the police and prosecution both deliberately created loopholes in order to pave the way for Salman's acquittal.

http://www.newsx.com/national/14909-did-faulty-procedures-lead-to-salmans-acquittal

Quote

Frequent Posters

karan-007

@karan-007

Stunner

+ 2

Posted: 9 years ago

However, some of the lawyers say that the police and prosecution both deliberately created loopholes in order to pave the way for Salman's acquittal.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Meredith

@Meredith

Dazzler

Posted: 9 years ago

salman bribed the police probably.

Quote

707793

Suspended

Posted: 9 years ago

lekin aisi judiciary ka kya fayda jo sabkuch jaante hue bhi ki rich people ne evidence ko temper kar diya or police or prosecution ke sath mil ke case ki watt laga di hai tab bhi verdict favor main diya ...sach main kanoon ANDHA hota hai

Judiciary apne app ko yeh keh ke alag nahi kar saktey ki EVIDENCE nahi they 😡 everyone knows ki kya hua hai iss case main 🥱

chalo ab saja nahi di kam se kam kuch crore ka compensation to de dete victimfamily ko ...ya sab kuch advocate hi lengey 😡

Quote

SudhaSangeet

@SudhaSangeet

Dazzler

+ 4

Posted: 9 years ago

Of course it is!
The state and result of any case depends on how well the prosecution presents its evidence and data. This case wasn't if Salman should be send to jail or not but to prevail justice for the victims. It was only fought from this angle. If not then who? No body is even cared. Most of the hit and run cases are open and shut due to lack of evidences. There were 4 people in that car dammit!
It took 12 years for hearing in lower court and how come his case was heard within 6 months of applying it in the high Court? Itni jaldi date kaise mili, there are lacs of cases pending for one hearing.

We all know how it works by now, pp had a poor case in with him, no proper evidences and no proper work on that case which he should.

Let's be honest he is making crores and crores for his industry, how will they let him go in jail!

Quote

pallavi25

@pallavi25

Inactive

+ 5

Posted: 9 years ago

2 comments from HT website:

In public interest..and for future use by Bollywood stars..Salman should at least tell the people...High Court ka Judge bikta kitne me hai??

The hurry with which bail was granted to Salman made it clear which way the verdict would go

Edited by pallavi25 - 9 years ago

Quote

707793

Suspended

Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: pallavi25
2 comments from HT website:
In public interest..and for future use by Bollywood stars..Salman should at least tell the people...High Court ka Judge bikta kitne me hai??

The hurry with which bail was granted to Salman made it clear which way the verdict would go

😆

Karan Arjun bhi aa gaye ab to 😆

dosti main 19-20 chalta rehta hai yeh inko itne salo baad samjh aaya jaise Judge saab ko samjh aaya ki Patil ki gawahi 19-20 thi 🥱