High Court dismisses Salman's plea to have Kamaal Khan as witness

ponymo thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 9 years ago
#1
Salman Khan, 2002 hit and run case, hit and run case, Salman Khan case, Salman Khan hit and run case, Kamaal Khan, Salman hit and run case, Salman case, Salman Khan NewsSalman Khan had on November 16 filed the application before Justice A R Joshi who is hearing the actor's appeal against the conviction and sentence handed over to him by a sessions court in connection with the case.

The Bombay High Court today dismissed an application filed by actor Salman Khan, sentenced to five-year jail term in the 2002 hit-and-run case, seeking examination of his friend and singer Kamaal Khan as a witness by the prosecution.


Salman Khan had on November 16 filed the application before Justice A R Joshi who is hearing the actor's appeal against the conviction and sentence handed over to him by a sessions court in connection with the case.


Under section 391 of Criminal Procedure Code, the high court can summon a witness while hearing an appeal "if it thinks additional evidence to be necessary".


Justice Joshi today, however, refused to summon Kamaal and said "recourse to section 391 is taken only in special cases where circumstances specially warrant it. There is nothing in the present case to entertain the application filed by the appellant (Salman) and summon Kamaal Khan."


"There is nothing to show that but for the substantial evidence of Kamaal Khan no decision can be taken in the appeal. If there is no dire need for the examination of Kamaal Khan and if the material available can be analysed in itself, then in the considered view of this court recourse to section 391 is not the ultimate requirement," Justice Joshi said.


The Court also took note of the fact that when the prosecution told the sessions court during examination of all its witnesses that Kamaal Khan could not be traced, Salman did not take any step at that stage.


"The appellant (Salman) chose to call Ashok Singh as defence witness at the fag end of the trial before the sessions court. He (Salman), however, did not take any steps to call Kamaal Khan as defence witness," the court said.


Kamaal Khan, who according to the prosecution and defence was present in the car prior to and at the time of the accident in September 2002, had not appeared before the magistrate court for recording his evidence. Only his statement was recorded by the police in 2002 under section 161 of CrPC.


Justice Joshi said he would continue hearing arguments of the prosecution in the appeal filed by Salman from tomorrow.


Senior counsel Amit Desai, appearing for Salman, sought a copy of the order passed by the court today, hinting that they would approach the Supreme Court.


"Why the prosecution had not examined this witness in the trial court?... Kamaal Khan is the best eyewitness available to the prosecution as he was present in Salman's car on September 28, 2002, when it rammed into a shop in Bandra killing one person and injuring four others," Desai had argued.


Kamaal can throw light on who was driving the car, the lawyer had said.

Salman's counsel has been saying that it was his driver Ashok Singh who was behind the wheel.


Other eyewitness, Salman's police bodyguard Ravindra Patil died during the trial in 2007. The prosecution relied on his statement before the magistrate implicated Salman but as the defence couldn't cross-examine him, it caused prejudice to the actor, advocate Desai said.


The trial court had on May 6 held Salman guilty of culpable homicide not amounting to murder, upholding the police's case that he was drunk and was driving the car when the accident took place in suburban Bandra.

Salman was convicted for ramming his car into a Bandra shop on September 28, 2002.


Created

Last reply

Replies

33

Views

2.3k

Users

22

Likes

114

Frequent Posters

ponymo thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 9 years ago
#2
I wonder how long Salman can drag this case with bullcrap excuses.
PAcino thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 30 Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#3

Originally posted by: ponymo

Salman Khan, 2002 hit and run case, hit and run case, Salman Khan case, Salman Khan hit and run case, Kamaal Khan, Salman hit and run case, Salman case, Salman Khan NewsSalman Khan had on November 16 filed the application before Justice A R Joshi who is hearing the actor's appeal against the conviction and sentence handed over to him by a sessions court in connection with the case.

The Bombay High Court today dismissed an application filed by actor Salman Khan, sentenced to five-year jail term in the 2002 hit-and-run case, seeking examination of his friend and singer Kamaal Khan as a witness by the prosecution.


Salman Khan had on November 16 filed the application before Justice A R Joshi who is hearing the actor's appeal against the conviction and sentence handed over to him by a sessions court in connection with the case.


Under section 391 of Criminal Procedure Code, the high court can summon a witness while hearing an appeal "if it thinks additional evidence to be necessary".


Justice Joshi today, however, refused to summon Kamaal and said "recourse to section 391 is taken only in special cases where circumstances specially warrant it. There is nothing in the present case to entertain the application filed by the appellant (Salman) and summon Kamaal Khan."


"There is nothing to show that but for the substantial evidence of Kamaal Khan no decision can be taken in the appeal. If there is no dire need for the examination of Kamaal Khan and if the material available can be analysed in itself, then in the considered view of this court recourse to section 391 is not the ultimate requirement," Justice Joshi said.


The Court also took note of the fact that when the prosecution told the sessions court during examination of all its witnesses that Kamaal Khan could not be traced, Salman did not take any step at that stage.


"The appellant (Salman) chose to call Ashok Singh as defence witness at the fag end of the trial before the sessions court. He (Salman), however, did not take any steps to call Kamaal Khan as defence witness," the court said.


Kamaal Khan, who according to the prosecution and defence was present in the car prior to and at the time of the accident in September 2002, had not appeared before the magistrate court for recording his evidence. Only his statement was recorded by the police in 2002 under section 161 of CrPC.


Justice Joshi said he would continue hearing arguments of the prosecution in the appeal filed by Salman from tomorrow.


Senior counsel Amit Desai, appearing for Salman, sought a copy of the order passed by the court today, hinting that they would approach the Supreme Court.


"Why the prosecution had not examined this witness in the trial court?... Kamaal Khan is the best eyewitness available to the prosecution as he was present in Salman's car on September 28, 2002, when it rammed into a shop in Bandra killing one person and injuring four others," Desai had argued.


Kamaal can throw light on who was driving the car, the lawyer had said.

Salman's counsel has been saying that it was his driver Ashok Singh who was behind the wheel.


Other eyewitness, Salman's police bodyguard Ravindra Patil died during the trial in 2007. The prosecution relied on his statement before the magistrate implicated Salman but as the defence couldn't cross-examine him, it caused prejudice to the actor, advocate Desai said.


The trial court had on May 6 held Salman guilty of culpable homicide not amounting to murder, upholding the police's case that he was drunk and was driving the car when the accident took place in suburban Bandra.

Salman was convicted for ramming his car into a Bandra shop on September 28, 2002.


]
If this ain't obstructing justice, i don't know what is!!!
pallavi25 thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 9 years ago
#4
Court did the right thing by rejecting his plea. Desai is just dragging the case, grasping at straws! Kamal Khan is a prosecution witness who has turned hostile due to bribes or threats or some kind of pressure. Didnt he flee the country just after the accident? Now after 13 yrs he has changed his statement, how much more obvious can this be?
448368 thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#5
Jail jaane k din kareeb aa raha hai
576281 thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#6
What an excuse for 'being human'...🤢
blue-ice. thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Achiever Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 9 years ago
#7
kissi bhi cheez ka koi fayada nahi...the criminal will be set free...all charges dropped..
448368 thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#8

Originally posted by: blue-ice

kissi bhi cheez ka koi fayada nahi...the criminal will be set free...all charges dropped..


I still have faith in our courts. But the system is so bad, influential and corrupt take utmost advantage of it 😒
hollyBollyWood thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#9
going by the last few statements made by his lawyer, seems like salman khan's got a crappy lawyer with no good strategy. however, the lawyer has successfully stalled case for so long.
568470 thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#10
After the typical Ekta serial twist, now I guess next twist in this case will be something similar to Sasural Simar Ka series. Salman can claim that a dayan/naagin/aatma possessed his soul and committed the crime, not him. Supernatural twist 🤣

Related Topics

Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: oyebollywood · 5 months ago

https://www.indiaforums.com/article/arbaaz-khan-and-sshura-khan-expecting-first-child-couples-visit-at-clinic-sparks-rumours_220788

Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: fazgostoso · 20 days ago

He recently had his comeback hit with Sitaare Zameen Par. Shahrukh and Salman are nowhere to be seen. Aamir Khan will also be producing that...

Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: BhataktiJawani · 1 months ago

What’s the plot behind all this? These two brothers don’t get along https://www.instagram.com/p/DNaCjQlB_NN/?igsh=MWE1bjNidGhtbm9zYg==

https://www.instagram.com/p/DNaCjQlB_NN/?igsh=MWE1bjNidGhtbm9zYg==
Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: Sultan.Mirza · 3 months ago

Salman wanted to do the remake of that Italian film on which Sitaare Zameen par had been made, he share this with Aamir. Instead of leaving it...

Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: oyebollywood · 3 months ago

...

Expand ▼
Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".