Which kind of acting impresses you more? - Page 3

Kareena, Vidya, Priyanka, Parineeti, Kangana...as long as anyone acts good, then they impress me.

Since when is Kareena natural? The woman is the definition of overacting in at least 80% of her work. All these actresses have certain kind of roles they excel in. Kangana requires unconventional roles. She can't do the common rom com heroine. Neither can Vidya or Priyanka. Watching them in those roles is same as watching Katrina and Sonam in roles with more substance.

If this is what "strategic acting" looks like then strategic acting it is for me.





For me good acting is when an actor completely transforms into the character, when you can't even see a trace of their real personalities. When they shed all their inhibitions, and are not tied to the shackles of glamour about how they will look & all. Nobody does it better than these two, I'll add Vidya to the list too. She is the third one who is as good as the two of them.
For Kangana, whether it is Datto or Rani, I did not see Kangana at all. Same with PC, Jhilmil ya Kashibai, MK ya sonia roy, I did not see I saw those characters.

Natural acting, but I don't mind the rehearsed style like PC, Aamir either.

I wouldn't say PC and Kangana aren't natural. Yeah they may have a process but it still comes across very natural on screen. You always see the character and not them on screen. Plus they've both played some challenging characters with complex story lines so it makes sense that there would be research and strategy behind those performances.

pc parineeti konkona nimrat kaur are natural versatile nt dependent on histrionics
method of acting so i prefer them 😆

I would say Natural acting like Konkona sen sharma does...I loved her in Mrs. And Ms. Iyer, it seems like a documentary movie more than an actual movie. I love those kind of acting.

Actors adopt a technique, understand the nuances, adjust their body language and put so much effort in it all to look natural and effortless onscreen. Method acting and effortlessness on screen aint mutually exclusive. They are correlated. It's not easy to slip very naturally into every charecter and role. There are some characters for which you need to adapt certain techniques, learn and understand a lot of things and attend workshops in general. Just because actors follow this process, they do not become mechanical. In fact this entire process helps you get into the skin of the character and make it more believable. PC, Kangana and Vidya. Their off screen persona doesn't dominate their onscreen characters most of the times. So for me, they all fall in the same category where they do GOOD acting. Simple. 😳

any type of acting is fine as long as it looks believable onscreen