Hey I just telling what I felt...no offense ..evn I like sid...
But whatever dd said was correct to some extent.
If we see initially rajveer was d villan and he was messing both the families relation sid knows abt that but he dint work on showing that properly..
He knows that rajveer was the groom of kritika wen he was d husband of sam still he couldnot stop.
Okay that was out of his control.. wen the truth of khuranas wer out all blamed dd , simmi and all but iy was sid who cudnt tell roshni and he was scared of loosing roshni...
After that he was called maha jamai for helping sam ..but she was in dat condition bcz of rajveer n kritika and sid just corrected his mistake of being on d side of his sister...
Divorcing roshni for returning dd property. Here he did a mistake of hiding his identity result was simmi snatched dd s property ...he corrected that by a deal. Whats mahanata in that??
He helped misha in dat condition and all butshe was der for him and he was indirectly responsible for death of shiv..
If he dint get shiv to dd house then dd used to live a life which is living bfre... but he brought shiv and raised hopes in dem and atlast he died leaving dd again in aghast.
Coming to the baby, they bought aisha who was actually a bait of shabnam to destroy roshni and she succeded in dat..I mean sidni lost yheir baby.
Later shabnam, he was d one who initially supported shabnam to b in d house to treat herself as a family member
If he dint support her then she would b out of house earlier itself..if he comes to know now and stop her whats that mahantha in that..
There are some places where sid was the indirect reason but he corrected later that doesnt mean he is mahanthaa..
Pls cvs show something new..where our sid will b real mahantha...
I M TELLING AGAIN ITS JUST A THOUGHT I GOT NO OFFENSE.
Anupamaa
Tu Juliet Jatt Di
