Poll
Weren't they too much?
Kyunki lost 35-40% of its audience
IRE vs IND 28th June at Belfast,2nd T20I,India tour of Ireland, 2026
Armaan sa ki maiyyat ki taiyaari
Salman Khan New House
Why Kajol Doubted PATHAAN's BO Collection?
🏏ICC Women's T20 World Cup 2026: Group A: India W vs Aus W🏏
Originally posted by: black_r4
Yes 36 wud hv been fyn for dat performance. 39 was way too mch
Originally posted by: Frozen.Desert
Exactly..a 36 or 37 would do, but 39 was too much!
Originally posted by: MrsKhan-Sobti
Tbh the performance was definitely not a 40 marks worth one and the comments were so way too much! So much favourism for shamita :/ I agree she is a good dancer but imo she hasn't shown any mind blowing growth as per se in JDJ as compared to other contestants!
Shamita is never going to show mind blowing growth because she is already an experienced dancer. She was never counted as a non dancer so there was never going to be a journey. The only thing she could do is the same as Faisal, become sharper and varied in her moves. So this argument about growth can not be properly applied on someone who can dance.
Shamita is never going to show mind blowing growth because she is already an experienced dancer. She was never counted as a non dancer so there was never going to be a journey. The only thing she could do is the same as Faisal, become sharper and varied in her moves. So this argument about growth can not be properly applied on someone who can dance.
As for her choreography, I will agree that Deepak could have extended her range. But most choreographies this season have been so so and not many have been truly mind blowing. There were moments here and there and little bits.Finally the judges. They have been very confusing from the start both in scoring and comments.
From an earlier argument I still hold the same view. Every contestant had some experience of dancing whether at awards or professionally as a career so to me everyone is a dancer. Some are just more experienced than others.