Originally posted by: Coolpree
Very interesting information! I am no war aficionado, but that must have made a very impressive sight. A 16th century version of creating " shock and Awe" in the hearts of the opponents.
As far as having a navy is concerned, I am absolutely shocked Akbar or at least his successors did not have one. I agree with Adiana and Shyamala that had he lived longer he probably would have had one...he did after all have some very large ships going for trade and pilgrimage.
BTW: 500 yrs before Akbar, the Chola dynasty of Tamil Nadu had a powerful Navy that they use very effectively for military conquest to Sri Lanka and the far east. As far as I know they are the first eastern empire to have a formal , powerful navy. That's a staggering achievement by any standards. So the technology was present in the region I assume...why did the mughals not develop a powerful navy I wonder.
A powerful navy may have changed the equation in a place like the Deccan especially for Shah Jehan and Aurangzeb maybe? It only goes to show that Akbar did all the hard work and his successors just withered the advantage away slowly but surely.
Preeti
364